The trial was listed for 12 May 2008. 21.     The proceedings are still pending before the Tarnowskie Góry District Court. B.     Proceedings under the 2004 Act 22.

Having regard to this and the overall length of the proceedings, the Court considers that the applicant has not been afforded a trial within a reasonable time. 22.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

The applicant remained in pre-trial detention until 13 October 1995. 11.     The applicant contested his detention pending trial.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

On 14 September 1993 he was placed in pre-trial detention, where he remained until 25 October 1994.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    On 5 November 1998 the pre-trial investigation was completed and the case was transferred to the Kyivsky District Court of Kharkiv. 10.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

The fact that he was able to defend himself in the proceedings merely ensured a fair trial but did not prove that he had a “right to a court”. 36.

law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial