CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 783 résultats pour « constitutionnalité »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0613JUD007763316

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2019

13 juin 2019

    The constitutionality of section 4 bis was specifically addressed by the Constitutional Court in judgment no. 306 of 11 June 1993.

Source officielle

Page 30 sur 1490

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1107DEC006123700

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2002

7 novembre 2002

On 24 August 2000 the applicant filed a constitutional complaint challenging the constitutionality of the above legislation. The Constitutional Court has not yet adopted any decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237819

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2024

4 octobre 2024

discrimination action lodged by the applicant association was dismissed by a final decision of 7 December 2021 of the Timişoara Court of Appeal, which reiterated that, in the light of the Romanian Constitutional

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD004393208

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

    On 26 October 2005 the Constitutional Court reviewed the constitutionality of the provisions of the Institute Act regarding access to documents held by the Institute (case no. K 31/04).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4046

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2005

11 janvier 2005

The Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal, and its decision was based on the same ground as its previous judgment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161763

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2016

2 mars 2016

With regard to the initiative for the review of constitutionality, the Constitutional Court held that the applicant had not exhausted the available remedies, as it had failed to raise the argument of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206DEC005381800

Admin. suprême

6 février 2003

6 février 2003

The Constitutional Court took up four of the complaints, not including the one lodged by the first applicant, and, on 27 November 1996, introduced ex-officio proceedings for the review of the constitutionality

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-247953

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2025

11 décembre 2025

On 19 June 2025, at a request of a group of deputies of the National Assembly, the Constitutional Court decided on the review of the constitutionality of, inter alia , the above-mentioned provision of

Source officielle
CA

Avis

CADA:20172167

Appel

21 juillet 2017

21 juillet 2017

à sa demande de communication d'une copie, sous format électronique, d'un document récapitulatif établissant depuis le 1er mars 2010 les délais de traitement de chaque question prioritaire de constitutionnalité

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0701DEC002665908

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2010

1 juillet 2010

On 10 June 2009 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's constitutional complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004DEC005597713

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

Domestic law did not provide that a political party could have recourse to the Federal Constitutional Court to have its constitutionality ascertained.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC002169406

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

The Government further noted that section   16(2) of the Constitutional Court Law expressly authorised the Constitutional Court to review the constitutionality of international treaties signed or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2369

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2007

11 décembre 2007

The Constitutional Court found the law constitutional.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1724033-1810183

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2006

5 juillet 2006

The X case , which had recognised an exception to the constitutional prohibition on abortion when the mother’s life was at risk from self harm, had shown that the constitutional courts could develop the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0302DEC004542499

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2000

2 mars 2000

violated his constitutional rights.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC003014396

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

Thecourt did not consider it necessary to have the constitutionality of the Extrajudicial Rehabilitation Act reviewed by the Constitutional Court (Ústavní soud) as requested by the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3231

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2006

11 juillet 2006

On 19 August 2002 the applicant challenged the constitutionality of the amendments before the Constitutional Court, which has not yet given a ruling.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0312DEC003757018

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2024

12 mars 2024

With particular regard to Albania, following the amendments of 12 August 2016 concerning the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court, in principle, a constitutional appeal became an effective remedy to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1007DEC001061307

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2014

7 octobre 2014

The Constitutional Court examined the constitutionality of the contested provision and rendered its judgment on 6 July 2011 (case   no.   P   12/09).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173353

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2017

6 avril 2017

In the light of the above, the Constitutional Court considers that it is possible to return to the examination of the constitutionality of [the impugned provisions of the CES] and admit [the applications

Source officielle