of the European Court of Human Rights in the S. case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kemal Güven case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Aygördü and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ağgül and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the İnce and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Güven Cemal and Nurhayat case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Matthies-Lenzen case delivered on 5 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Parisse case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention

obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by it ; Whereas during the examination of the case by the Committee of Ministers, the Government of the respondent State indicated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Manasson case delivered on 20 July 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

Ministers concerning the application of previous Article 54 which are, for the time being, applicable by analogy to cases transmitted to it under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention; Having satisfied

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Loyen No. 2 delivered on 30 September 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

Court of Human Rights in the case of Netolický and Netolická delivered on 11 January 2005 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

Court of Human Rights in the Balasoiu case delivered on 20 April 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated

Court of Human Rights in the case of Susini and others delivered on 3 June 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the

of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention; Having satisfied itself that on 12 December 2002, within the time-limit agreed to under the terms of the friendly

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kisa and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Civelek and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Barata Dias case delivered on 4 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated