In such circumstances, the assets become the “possessions” of that third party.

On 22 April 1998 the ruling became final and enforceable.

This was the moment when the applicant became aware for the first time of the fees that had been granted to A. 16.

One such decision extending the applicant’s pre-trial detention was rendered on 26 October 2018 and became final of 5 November 2018.

de la SELARL BECAM/MONCALIS, avocat au barreau d'ESSONNE Assistés sur l'audience par Me Philippe MONCALIS de la SELARL BECAM/MONCALIS, avocat au barreau d'ESSONNE INTIMÉS Monsieur [J] [M]

The applicant, or at least her representative, became aware of that decision no later than 19 September 2008 (see paragraphs 14 and 23 above).

The applicant had become aware of that during his stay in Sofia in May 2009.

  Mr Léger became eligible for parole on 5   July 1979 after 15 years in prison. Between 1985 and 1998 he made numerous applications for release, all of which were refused.

It was of the view that it was lawful as it was not open to doubt that the offence of abuse of official powers had become prescribed five years after the events concerned, in 2001.

However, in a case where an applicant avails himself of a domestic remedy and it becomes clear, at a later stage, that this remedy was not effective, this six-month period should in principle be calculated

  In 1994 and 1995 the weekly published three articles concerning an action in defamation that had been brought in the Slovakian courts by Mr Dušan Slobodník, a Minister who later became a Member

This judgment became binding on 24   October 2001, but was not enforced. 7.     On 25 December 2001 the town court awarded the applicant RUB   347,406.

The judgment became final. 8.

On 13 March 2002 the judgment became final. 7.     The applicant sued the Irkutsk Regional prosecutor's office and the Ministry of Finance for compensation for damage. 8.

The Regional Court further decided that the measure would be reviewed six months from the date the judgment became final (5 June 2010). 4.

aware, or ought to have become aware, of the judgment subject to appeal ( Magomedov and Others v.

The judgment became final on 10 July 2007.

While the proceedings were pending before the Court, another Hungarian limited liability company, Ecoprevent Kft (“the applicant company”) became its successor. 2.

This judgment became binding on 26 January 1999. It was enforced on 22 April 1999. 6.

    On 18 April 2003 the judgment became final and enforceable. 12.     On 23 June 2003 the Registration Office registered the applicant’s title to the centre. 13.