CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD002943504
14 décembre 2006
Relying on Article 13 of the Convention, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 the applicant complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments given in her favour.
Page 31 sur 606
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC001946304
24 mai 2011
The Court is satisfied that the excessive length of the execution of judgments in the applicants' favour is acknowledged by the Government either explicitly or in substance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0117JUD003764704
17 janvier 2008
On 9 September 2004 the Town Court recovered in the applicant's favour the unpaid food allowance over the period between 1 January 2004 and 31 March 2004 in the amount of RUB 1,139.34 and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213JUD001730403
13 décembre 2005
The applicant complained of the failure of the State authorities to execute the judgments of 7 May 1999 and 30 August 2001 given in her favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD001903703
10 août 2006
The applicant complained about the length of the non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0131JUD004275204
31 janvier 2008
By default judgment of 21 November 2001 the Teykovo Town Court of the Ivanovo Region awarded 11,151.90 Russian roubles (RUB) in her favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD002818104
The applicant complained about the length of the non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC002157805
28 juin 2011
The Court is satisfied that the excessive length of the execution of judgments in the applicants’ favour is acknowledged by the Government either explicitly or in substance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218DEC003035406
18 décembre 2012
1 about quashing of judgments in their favour by way of supervisory review. THE LAW 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD002292402
1 on account of the non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour. 15.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925JUD002050910
25 septembre 2018
On 8 March 2007 the Diyarbakır public prosecutor filed an indictment charging the applicant and eleven other individuals with disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK under section 7
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2162276-2317118
13 novembre 2007
Moldova (no. 32347/04) This case concerns the applicant’s complaint about a national judicial decision in her favour not being enforced in good time.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1127JUD002823012
27 novembre 2025
’s favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD003221505
5 avril 2011
The applicant alleged that the final and binding domestic judgment in his favour had not been enforced in a timely manner. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920JUD002221902
20 septembre 2005
The judgments in the applicant’s favour remain unenforced. II. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 12.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152958
16 février 2015
1 about the failure to enforce judgments in their favour in good time.
2ème chambre 2ème section
670426888d5cd4a875912605
1 octobre 2024
VXL NOTAIRES AVOCATs DEFENDEURS représentés par Maître Catherine FAVAT de la SELARL FBC AVOCATS - #C1806 représentée par Maître Marc PANTALONI - #P0025 ORDONNANCE DE CLÔTURE Nous, Robin VIRGILE,
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2001:302
31 mai 2001
#Recurso de casación - Azúcar - Reglamento (CE) n. 2613/97 - Ayudas en favor de los productores de azúcar de remolacha - Supresión - Campaña 2001/2002 - Recurso de anulación - Personas físicas o jurídicas
TRIBUNAL_UE
ECLI:EU:T:2020:98
12 mars 2020
#Ayudas de Estado — Ayudas otorgadas por España en favor de ciertos clubes de fútbol profesional — Aval — Decisión por la que se declara que las ayudas son incompatibles con el mercado interior — Ventaja
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD001690906
21 juillet 2009
The applicants requested that the State be ordered to pay, from its own funds, the sums awarded by the final judgments rendered in their favour. 75.