, and the opinions of human rights activists were their own subjective opinion not based on real facts. 13.

In the present case, the applicant complained that there were snakes in his ward.

Prosecutor: What incidents of theft do you admit [were committed by you]?

They were represented before the Court by Mr   M. Erbil, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

On 1 November 2005 the applicant went to Istanbul during his annual leave. As his condition had worsened, on 17 November 2005 he went to Haydarpaşa GATA Military Hospital upon his own initiative.

Meanwhile, one of the participants went to the restaurant where the Roma were holding a wedding party and most probably told lies [about the incident].

no 02 / 2371 APPELANTS : LA COMPAGNIE D'ASSURANCES GFA CARAIBES (GROUPE GENERALI) dont le siège social est 46 / 48, rue Ernest-Deproge 97206 FORT DE FRANCE CEDEX Représentée par Me Daniel WERTER

The applicants were represented before the Court by Mr M. Ekimdzhiev and Ms K. Boncheva, lawyers practising in Plovdiv.

Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 17   November 2009 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Rait Maruste,   Isabelle

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The applicants, Mr Dusan Filipovski, Mr Ljubomir Filipovski and Mrs   Vera Jovanovska are Macedonian nationals who were born in 1959, 1929 and 1954

The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Dimova, of the Ministry of Justice.

Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 16   March 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Karel Jungwiert,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

), sitting on 7   October 2008 as a Chamber composed of:   Rait Maruste, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Volodymyr Butkevych,   Renate Jaeger,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

    The applicants were represented by Mr W.L. Weh, a lawyer practising in Bregenz, Austria. The Liechtenstein Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador D.

The complaints concerning non-enforcement were communicated to the Government, who submitted their unilateral declarations to settle the cases.

that the case originated in an application (No. 22862/93) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 29 September 1993 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by Mrs Isabelle

of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27   April 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Rait Maruste,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

The Court referred to the Federal Constitutional Court’s decision which had noted that, according to the curriculum of the ethics classes, teachers were not allowed to unduly influence pupils.

  The Court reiterated first of all that civil servants acting in their official capacity were subject to wider limits of acceptable criticism than ordinary individuals (even though it could prove