violation de l’article   6 §§   1 et 3 c) de la Convention, pour les mêmes motifs que ceux retenus par l’arrêt Salduz , précité, dans ses paragraphes 56 à 59 et 62 (voir, aussi, Böke et Kandemir

#Alex Kande Mupompa pret Eiropas Savienības Padomi.

link between the injury and the alleged ill ‑ treatment, it cannot be established that the applicant was subjected to ill ‑ treatment by the police (see, mutatis mutandis , Böke and Kandemir

    Au vu de sa jurisprudence constante en la matière (voir Kadem   c.   Malte , n o 55263/00, §§ 43 à 45, 9 janvier 2003   ; Rehbock   c.

individual's personal liberty is at stake, the Court has set up very strict standards concerning the State's compliance with the requirement of speedy review of the lawfulness of detention (see, for example, Kadem

Au vu de sa jurisprudence constante (voir Kadem c. Malte , n o 55263/00, §§ 43 à 45, 9 janvier 2003   ; Rehbock   c.

    The Court reiterates that it has previously found a violation of Article   5 § 4 in cases where appeal proceedings lasted seventeen (see Kadem v. Malta , no.

Sabatier-Raffin, juge des référés ; - et les observations orales de Me Mathurin-Kancel, se substituant à Me Guillaume-Matime, et représentant M. E.

it has held in previous cases, that does not preclude this complaint in relation to Article 3 from being “arguable” for the purposes of the State’s positive obligation to investigate (see, Böke and Kandemir

alakohta – Uuden työkyvyttömyyslautakunnan koolle kutsumisen tarpeellisuus – Henkilöstösääntöjen 73 artiklan mukaisesti annetun aikaisemman päätöksen merkityksellisyys – Työjärjestyksen 76 artikla – Kanne

Poland , no. 33492/96, § 91, 21 December 2000; Kadem v. Malta , no. 55263/00, § 44, 9 January 2003; Sarban v. Moldova , no.   3456/05, § 118, 4 October 2005; and, more recently, Toma v.

Türkiye 07/02/2023 Fatih BIYIKLI 1990 Balıkesir Turkish 67. 10184/23 Kandil v. Türkiye 09/02/2023 Hamit Ali KANDİL 1979 Samsun Turkish 68. 10251/23 Erol v.

    Au vu de sa jurisprudence constante (voir Kadem c. Malte , n o   55263/00, §§ 44 et 45, 9 janvier 2003 et Rehbock c.

  The Court considers that the period of 41 days which elapsed did not correspond to the requirement of a speedy judicial decision within the meaning of Article   5 § 4 of the Convention ( Kadem

koskevaa päätöstä – 2 artiklan 9 kohta – Muutoksenhakuviranomainen, joka ei ole oikeusviranomainen – Julkista hankintaa koskevan sopimuksen tekeminen ennen kuin kyseisen elimen päätöksestä on nostettu kanne

#Alex Kande Mupompa gegen Rat der Europäischen Union.

#Alex Kande Mupompa срещу Съвет на Европейския съюз.

detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Failure to communicate the prosecutor’s opinion Lack of reasonable suspicion 64 49849/18 Kandemir

The applicant was also held in the “white (isolation)   cells” in Kandra Prison.

[K], salarié de la société Precia Molen, au café 'Kanteen' à [Localité 2]. M. [S] y a écrit que dans le cadre de cette discussion, de nombreuses informations ont été transmises à M. [K] par M.