The first applicant was taken to the Maze in a Landrover and the second applicant was taken as a passenger in the suspected vehicle driven by a policeman, with two soldiers in the back.

       On 5 December 1991, the applicant inspected the car in the presence of a policeman. Photographs were taken of the repairs done by the applicant.

    Administrative proceedings concerning the police’s failure to protect the applicants In November 2010 a number of protesters, including all the applicants, lodged an action with the Kharkiv

11 p.m. the same day, indicated that the killing was had been ordered by the ruling Socialist Party and that the killer had been identified as J.M., who at that time was head of the Order Police ( Policia

He argued again, among other things, that the Parliamentary Ombudsman had strongly objected to the police’s practice of attaching importance to the illegality of the intoxicant in question, and also complained

  CIVIL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST MR M     In 1991 the first applicant and others instituted civil proceedings against Mr M in the multi-member first instance civil court ( polimeles protodikio

Helmi Poikela, a pensioner born in 1923 and resident at            Pelkosenniemi;         3.    Mr.

At the police station, half an hour after the police’s arrival at the co ‑ operative’s building, between 9 and 10 p.m., the applicant was informed that he had been arrested in connection with insults

In the police's opinion, it was necessary to immobilise the applicant in order to prevent him from alerting the deserter, if the deserter was in fact hiding in the applicant's home.

The demonstrators, including the applicant, refused to comply with the police’s order to remove the vehicles and leave. Apart from ambulances, no vehicles could pass the blockade.

The applicant was told once more, in the video recording, that the march had been banned and she was asked politely to leave Gorkiy Square.

The municipal police’s decisions could not be enforced because of the interim measure issued in 2015, which was to remain in force until the expropriation proceedings were terminated. 41.

In a judgment of 18 February 2008 the Burgas Administrative Court found the disputed detention order lawful, noting that the police’s explanations showed that there had been a reasonable suspicion that

The applicant brought the grievances to the prosecutor’s office in the town of Anna in the Voronezh Region which upheld the police’s decision to decline institution of criminal proceedings. 5.

The judge notified about the urgent interception of the telephone communications did not carry out any judicial review of the police’s decision to tap his telephone and no independent authority had assessed

The judge notified about the urgent interception of the telephone communications did not carry out any judicial review of the police’s decision to tap his telephone and no independent authority had assessed

appeal complaint on 09/02/2021; no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

The applicant complains that due to the police’s actions he is severely disabled, paraplegic.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the police’s actions had constituted provocation and also that the police had fabricated the case against him.