On 30 July 2002 the same court declared her appeal inadmissible owing to its procedural shortcomings. 11.

    The same notification also accused a representative of the applicant cooperative and an intermediary of participation in the offence.

At the same hearing, it ordered the release of all the accused who had not been already released by then. 11.

      Repetitive case   In the following case the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:   Fehmi Koç v.

On the same day the court issued a separate ruling, indicating that the pre-trial investigation had lasted unreasonably long and had included periods when the proceedings had been suspended for no convincing

case between the same parties on 2 November 2006.

    A payment slip of the same date confirmed that the court paid that amount to the court officers involved in the above on-site inspection. 9.

  Repetitive cases (in which the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the European Convention on Human Rights) can be found at the end of this press

During the same period the number of cases examined by that court varied between 10,326 and 13,350 per year. 35.

They have thus lasted more than six years. 36.

The proceedings before the Supreme Court had lasted longer due to its excessive workload for the respective period. 31.

On the same day, he was also brought before a judge at the İstanbul State Security Court who ordered his remand in custody. 7.

At the same time the applicant disagreed to holding hearings in her absence.

On the same date a decision was taken to remand him in custody pending trial based, in particular, on the seriousness of the charge against him.

Later on the same day, N.T. went to his house with a bag which he carried with difficulty.

    On the same date the applicants were formally arrested and recognised as suspects.

city rather than to the trial court located in the same city. 17.

On the same date the Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s request concerning the amount of maintenance. 19.

The applicant submitted that it had lasted a few minutes and the psychiatrists had seemed not to have read the case-file.

    On the same day the Ankara State Security Court ordered the applicants to be detained on remand.