CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD000471107
29 juin 2021
In that letter they described the events of 19-20 July 2005 and noted that they still had not received a copy of the minutes of their arrest, which deprived them of the possibility of appealing against
Page 31 sur 6767
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD005732500
13 novembre 2007
This culminated in their attempted extermination by the Nazis, who considered them an inferior race.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187328
4 octobre 2018
It held that there had been misconception on the part of the authorities, as to the facts and the law, in their assessment of whether the residence criteria had been fulfilled and in their assessment of
soc
6137211dcd580146773f11a9
12 décembre 1989
à l'arrêt de l'avoir débouté de sa demande d'heures supplémentaires alors, selon le moyen, que, sans qu'il soit nécessaire de produire de document, il démontrait de façon péremptoire que, la durée théorique
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD003452910
15 octobre 2013
They ran down to the lower floor and took their daughters into their bedroom on the second floor of the house. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0829JUD005946421
29 août 2024
The defence then requested, without explaining their relevance to the applicants’ case, that they be called as witnesses for the defence. The request was granted by the trial court. 39 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406JUD007380201
6 avril 2006
They repeated the arguments they submitted before the Court at the admissibility stage concerning their objection for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516JUD006348111
16 mai 2019
They pointed out that, while the market value of compensation bonds was usually lower than the face value, there had been periods where bonds had actually been traded at their face value.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021JUD002491916
21 octobre 2021
They also considered that since they resided in Kyiv (as confirmed by their IDP certificates) they “belonged” to the respective territorial communities there.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2541817-2754090
4 novembre 2008
According to the applicants, the officers had handcuffed them to the foot of a table and had then struck them, in order to force them to write what the police officers dictated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909
28 juin 2012
In reaching this conclusion, the court also had regard to the fact that the family was united, that several of them were adults and that they had family and friends in Yemen who supported them. 22.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2718812-2971322
28 avril 2009
the reason for their infertility; they also complain of being thus denied access to court as they were unable to assess in a qualified manner the position in their cases for later
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC001168003
11 octobre 2011
In this latter respect, the applicant alleged that on the date of his disappearance their son had telephoned them on his mobile phone and stated that he was in that casino.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD006827314
22 décembre 2020
They noted that they had discussed the matter with their clients and made it clear that the latter approved their decision.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0529DEC000587472
29 mai 1974
This confirmed, in her opinion, that there was no proof that she knew about the hold-ups or approved, and assisted in, them.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2139
10 avril 2012
They complained before the European Court about the risk of serving their prison term in the US in ADX Florence, a super-max prison, where they would be subjected to special administrative measures, and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC002095306
21 octobre 2008
This time, it was a tête-à-tête . 'They met in the so ‑ called lower dining room in the main building of the Centre' says the employee, who was serving at their table.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0909DEC003176796
9 septembre 1998
This is also the reason why the interrogations of [the applicants] have focused on these traces.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD000440303
14 décembre 2006
On the other hand, the defendants claimed that they had entered the applicants' premises under the false assumption that these premises were covered by a tenancy agreement they had just concluded. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD006364814
12 septembre 2024
The applicants argued that the order for them to vacate the premises had in fact constituted an eviction from their home, which was unfair and arbitrary.