They further contend that the applicant was not deprived of the ownership of the remaining shares.

They further contended that they also could have solved their pension problem had they been willing to “bribe those in charge”. 21.

There was, however, no evidence that it had been dispatched on that date.

He had known from the third disciplinary military unit that A.T. had been a calm, quiet person who had behaved normally and manifested no signs of psychiatric problems; he had never been regarded as someone

They also submitted that, in their view, there were no tangible differences between the old and the new statements of the three witnesses and expressed the opinion that the applicant’s allegations in that

The applicant turned down the deal, describing O.P.’s suggestions as a conspiracy theory and nonsense.

They included a complaint that the medical centre took it for granted in its expert opinion that her lungs functioned normally, relying on the report of Dr F., which was not in the file however.

In particular, owners of properties “frozen” for the purpose of future expropriations as a result of the adoption of such plans could normally continue to use their properties as they had been using them

    The Court observes that there is no indication in the case file that notice of the request for an investigation was officially served on the applicant, nor is there any provision in the relevant

Nor was there any case-law to that effect.

The existence of the remedies must be sufficiently certain, in practice as well as in theory, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

They argued that they had acquired the plot of land in good faith.

From past experience, they feared that they might be beaten. They ran to hide in the gardens south of the village. They did not hear anyone shouting after them to stop.

In an inquest it should never be forgotten that there are no parties, no indictment, there is no prosecution, there is no defence, there is no trial, simply an attempt to establish the facts.

They submitted that the cell-space factor was an insufficient basis on which to conclude that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention as regards Tomsk Remand Centre.

innocent has been violated by a public statement about a person’s guilt, so that they are placed in the same position as they would have been had the violation not occurred.

L'enduit que l'entreprise mandatée devait appliquer sur la façade est de nature à améliorer le confort thermique.

The first two applicants are cousins and the third applicant is the nephew of the first applicant. They were born in 1950, 1951 and 1974 respectively.

they wished.