Thus she maintained her bid for partition in kind, making it clear to the domestic authorities that she did not want to leave the house. 47.

The Inspector found that the layout of the cemetery was discernible and that certain parts of the cemetery were intact (the foundations of a house of prayer, a stone wall and some gravestones).

In judgment no. 185/1993 the Constitutional Court declared the question inadmissible, holding that the legislature alone was responsible for taking swift and appropriate action to remedy the situation.

time in his written observations to the Court, dated 30   January 2008, the applicant also complained about the general conditions of his detention, including the cell size and permissible outdoor walks

Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Azerbaijani national, Mr   Fariz Alam

    During that second meeting the applicant had explained that he was not alone but was part of a group working throughout Turkey.

was unlawful as it amounted to a closing-down of the activities; (g) pursuant to the 1964 Act, as interpreted in the light of the Environment Protection Act 1969 (miljöskyddslagen 1969:387) and the Water

Plots of land adjacent to railway tracks or intended for the placement of such tracks are classified as railway rights of way, as is land occupied by or intended for the placement of railway terminals, water

As a result, water had penetrated the boat, first through one of the side windows that was open at the time of navigation, causing the boat to sink quickly.

but a struggle to expand the Islamic State, which had to be carried out even if the “unfaithful” did not attack Muslims, the documents in question openly advocated and glorified warfare in the name of Allah

Italy, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Ivana Jelić, President,   Erik Wennerström,   Alena Poláčková,   Frédéric Krenc,   Alain

sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Ivana Jelić , President ,   Alena Poláčková,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Gilberto Felici,   Erik Wennerström,   Alain

On 19 June 2002 the court disallowed his action for want of jurisdiction.

ON ARTICLE 6 PARA. 1 TAKEN ALONE (art. 6-1) 20.

and of the application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 10 (art. 10) of the Convention, taken alone

Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two British nationals, Mr Ilyas Hanif (“the first applicant”) and Mr Bakish Allah

The clerk explained that on the morning of 20 April 2015 the second applicant had come to the court registry and said, “If any application comes in, I want to see it personally.”

sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Ivana Jelić , President ,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Gilberto Felici,   Erik Wennerström,   Raffaele Sabato,   Alain

Serghides,   Raffaele Sabato,   Frédéric Krenc,   Alain Chablais,   Anna Adamska-Gallant , judges , and Ilse Freiwirth, Section Registrar, Having regard to: the application (no.