Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2082782-2205923
29 août 2007
29 août 2007
They also relied on the Land Registration Act 1925, which provided that, after the expiry of the 12-year period, the registered owner held the land in trust for the squatter.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68341-68809
5 avril 2001
5 avril 2001
The European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, on the ground that the applicant was not brought
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68033-68501
19 octobre 1999
19 octobre 1999
The hearing was held on 11 December 1992. On 30 June 1993 one of the judges participating in that hearing retired.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-440543-441199
7 novembre 2001
7 novembre 2001
It held, by six votes to one, that a finding of a violation constituted sufficient just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-994859-1027554
11 mai 2004
11 mai 2004
However, both applicants were held in pre-placement detention in an ordinary remand centre while waiting for a place in the TBS clinic selected for them to become available: Mr Brand for over 14
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2207229-2353962
6 décembre 2007
6 décembre 2007
In July 2004 Athens Court of Appeal accepted that the facts were not inaccurately reported in the article and held that the offence of defamation had not been made out.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68221-68689
8 février 2000
8 février 2000
In the second case, which concerns Josef Prinz, an Austrian national born in 1945 and detained in Göllersdorf, Austria, the Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 §
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2294714-2470009
18 mars 2008
18 mars 2008
The European Court of Human Rights held that there had been an interference with Dacia S.R.L.’s property rights.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68116-68584
29 février 2000
29 février 2000
The court of appeal reduced the sum payable by the applicant but held that he had not proved that the bank had been at fault.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1914870-2011322
13 février 2007
13 février 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3 and Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant EUR 5,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2057873-2178037
4 juillet 2007
4 juillet 2007
The case was eventually remitted to the Military Bench of the Budapest Regional Court which held on 18 January 2001 that Mr Korbély was guilty of a crime against humanity, having committed and incited
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158166
28 septembre 2015
28 septembre 2015
An NGO for the protection of women’s rights (of which the applicant was director) intervened in a family dispute between D.O. and his wife C.O. following a request for help from C.O.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC007128712
15 avril 2014
15 avril 2014
On 15 May 2012 the applicant sought help at the Psychiatric Department of Péterfy Sándor Hospital in Budapest, complaining of insomnia and anxiety attacks.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1512551-1582355
24 novembre 2005
24 novembre 2005
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-622912-628137
25 septembre 2002
25 septembre 2002
It held that the passage concerning the oath of obedience was defamatory because it indicated dependence on the instructions of a political party and that the allegations in the remainder of the article
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2151417-2285315
16 octobre 2007
16 octobre 2007
Consequently, the Court held that there had been no violation of Article 10 concerning that statement.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1180663-1225613
4 novembre 2004
4 novembre 2004
eight years and four months when the Commission adopted its report and that the applicant had had to wait a further five years before they were brought to a close, the European Court of Human Rights held
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1844930-1936276
14 novembre 2006
14 novembre 2006
The Court held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and unanimously that there had
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-568499-570892
19 juin 2002
19 juin 2002
The Constitutional Court further held that the public declarations of the RP ’s leaders, and in particular Necmettin Erbakan, Şevket Kazan and Ahmet Tekdal, had a direct bearing on the constitutionality
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1330605-1388301
1 juin 2005
1 juin 2005
A hearing in the case was held on 15 May 2003.
Source officiellePage 32 sur 2440
HELLIERE, Patrick, Gérard, Pascal
17/04/2026
Voir →
SARL HELLIER
18/12/2025
Voir →
SCCV DU HELLIER, STE EN LIQUIDATION
10/08/2025
Voir →
SELARL DU DOCTEUR HELLIER
15/07/2025
Voir →
Roul De La Helliere, Gaétan, Aymeric, Raymond
20/04/2025
Voir →