Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114343
8 octobre 2012
8 octobre 2012
filling up his bank accounts, without anyone holding him accountable”.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:1220DEC000301167
20 décembre 1967
20 décembre 1967
From his statements and from documents submitted by him in support of his present Application against the Federal Republic of Germany, it appears that, since September 1954, his mother had rented
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1966:0330DEC000264665
30 mars 1966
30 mars 1966
He states that after his arrest he had refused to make submissions before the police but, after the Senior Public Prosecutor Dr. had told him that in this case it was likely that his detention on remand
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0115DEC003040696
15 janvier 1998
15 janvier 1998
He immediately objected to the intention to prohibit him from practising his profession.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198534
24 octobre 2019
24 octobre 2019
breached his rights to private and family life.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140159
18 décembre 2013
18 décembre 2013
By failing to inform him of the actual charge against him at the beginning of the proceedings, the authorities had in practice negated his defence rights.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111294
15 mai 2012
15 mai 2012
He was referred to the Station of the Slovenske Konjice Police where he requested the police to explain him the charges against him which related to his alleged driving.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC002750495
14 janvier 1998
14 janvier 1998
On 21 June 1994 the applicant again requested the prosecutor to release him on bail, submitting that his isolation from his family had resulted in both his daughter
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115036
7 novembre 2012
7 novembre 2012
After he had signed a record of arrest ( protokół zatrzymania ) the police officers beat him up. The applicant was hit on his head and face. He was also kicked on his leg, back and chest.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114344
8 octobre 2012
8 octobre 2012
In the evening of 25 September 2002 E. paid a visit to M.V. at the latter’s business headquarters in Braşov and asked him to return 50,000 US dollars which E. had allegedly lent him to help him start his
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0407DEC000247265
7 avril 1967
7 avril 1967
against the Volkswagenwerke has been deliberately sabotaged; that his deportation prevents him from visiting his parents living in Germany and caused the breakdown of his marriage.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11661
7 septembre 2017
7 septembre 2017
The decision to detain him was reviewed on eight occasions. The applicant was convicted at his trial and given a custodial sentence. He appealed.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248866
30 janvier 2026
30 janvier 2026
him as an “offender of terrorism”.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6526
24 août 1999
24 août 1999
His wife and children joined him there from June to August 1997. His further request for annulment of the expulsion order was rejected.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504DEC000948702
4 mai 2006
4 mai 2006
On several occasions he requested the investigator in charge of his case and the town prosecutor to release him.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409JUD007007310
9 avril 2013
9 avril 2013
A few days later, he claimed that the Taliban had come to his home, had made further threats against him and, in his absence, had kidnapped his cousin.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1973:0205DEC000552572
5 février 1973
5 février 1973
September 1971; - the alleged refusal to allow him to consult his lawyer for a period of two weeks or to receive visits from his fiancée and friends and the alleged withholding of all his outgoing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-241959
23 janvier 2025
23 janvier 2025
According to the applicant, during the first fourteen hours of his police custody, the authorities did not allow him to take his medicine and at one point seized it from the applicant, refused him access
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD006454101
24 novembre 2009
24 novembre 2009
The applicant alleged, in particular, that he had been hit by a police officer, that the criminal proceedings against him had been unfair and that his property rights had been violated. 4
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118365
12 mars 2013
12 mars 2013
In particular, police officers had beaten him up on different parts of his body. Then they closed his eyes with a hat, put his arms behind his back, handcuffed him and tied his legs.
Source officiellePage 32 sur 3277