CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC007525510
15 novembre 2016
As a matter of fact, he is even initiating them.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD003998722
13 novembre 2025
It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Ribarev v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0628DEC007657114
28 juin 2022
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD001668014
19 décembre 2017
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Peňaranda Soto v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628JUD000831907
28 juin 2011
The Digli and Mirifle take an intermediate position between the majority clans and the minority groups. 39.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235242
28 juin 2024
  26542 of 26   May 2017 4. 82104/17 Mazzeo v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD001995392
7 août 1996
The judgment concerned does notcontain any provision relating to civil matters.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD007164513
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Yanez Pinon and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD003929409
30 juin 2015
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Peruzzi v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001176485
9 mars 1989
  One of the most striking examples of this is that on certain stretches of the coast the public may fish freely with nets but may not use hand-held tackle.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD006420901
26 juillet 2007
The 13 May issue in fact came out during the evening of 12 May, in accordance with the practice of Trud 's publishers. 9 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC002937716
21 octobre 2021
2021 11/03/2021 200 30   13334/18 08/03/2018 (57 requérants) Alfonso AMATO 1951 Carmelo Luciano ANSALDI 1961 Michele AUGELLO 1960 Nicolò BLANDINO 1958 Mario BONOMO 1944 Francesco CARTENZIO 1959 Diego
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC000652403
13 mai 2014
    On 15 May 2013 Law no. 165/2013 came into force, setting out various proceedings available to the petitioners seeking to have their restitution claims solved. 4 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD000108510
27 février 2018
It may be subject to editorial revision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0727JUD000719804
27 juillet 2006
Spain (no. 56673/00, §   61, ECHR 2003 ‑ V) and De Diego Nafría v. Spain (no. 46833/99, §   39, 14   March 2002).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620JUD002449221
20 juin 2023
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Oktay Alkan v.
Page 32 sur 32