At the same time the Civil Court held that, in accordance with domestic law, Malta had jurisdiction to try him even if the crime had been committed outside of its borders.

    On the same date, the prosecutor issued an order prohibiting the applicant from leaving town for thirty days. 7.

On the same date the Człuchów District Court also received a statement taken from the applicant by the Jastrzębie District Court. No hearing was held in 1996.

The applicants also maintained under the same provision that they had been denied a trial within a reasonable time. 18.

The applicant also complains that his detention lasted too long.

On the same date, three neighbours of   G.P. and I.P. were interviewed.

In the course of the proceedings, the two lay members were changed, but the presiding judge remained the same. 10.

The proceedings in questions have already lasted more than twenty years. They had already lasted approximately two years on the last-mentioned date before one level of jurisdiction. 33.

    The same day the police officers drew up a report on the applicant’s forceful resistance to the police.

Accordingly, the proceedings to be taken into consideration lasted six years six months and sixteen days.

His complaint was examined by the same panel of judges and on the same day as the first applicant's complaint. The second applicant's complaint was partly rejected and partly dismissed.

The prosecutor must be notified at the same time. 28.

On 1 June 1999 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law to the Supreme Court ( Riigikohus ) raising the same arguments as in his appeal to the Court of Appeal.

The violation of that obligation had become all the more obvious the longer the proceedings had lasted.

On the same day and on 17 October 1994 the applicant also added some documents. 10.

A further adjournment was ordered on the same ground on 9 February 1993. The appeal in cassation was finally heard on 11 May 1993.

On 9 April 2000 a second medical report was drafted in respect of the applicant, with the same conclusions.

This case involved the different application of the same legislation depending on a person’s residence.

He alleges a violation of Article   5   §   3 of the Convention on account of the length of his police custody which lasted fourteen days.

On the same day the European Court, to which the applicant had applied for an interim measure under Rule   39 of the Rules of Court, indicated to the French Government that it would be advisable not