CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002256709
23 juin 2016
The applicants alleged that the measures taken against them, namely the search of their vehicle and their editorial office, the seizure of their radio equipment and their conviction, had
Page 32 sur 6767
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002487694
18 janvier 2001
There remained few stopping places upon which they could lawfully park their caravan whilst travelling in the area and they faced the threat of continual eviction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0310JUD000283266
10 mars 1972
On the other hand, the Court held that there had been a breach of Article 5 (4) (art. 5-4) in that the applicants had "had no remedy open to them before a court against the decisions ordering their detention
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0904DEC002495704
4 septembre 2012
He then heard Adem Avul asking for help and found him lying down on the ground. F.A. called his fellow villagers and told them their location.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0503DEC001274287
3 mai 1989
This meant that Pine Valley were excluded from the benefit of the section, for they had exercised their constitutional right to litigate the validity of the planning permission in the Courts.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0518DEC007271301
18 mai 2004
The respondent's representative maintained during the hearing that these extracts were merely presumptions of the author of the article. However, he failed to confirm this.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC006227909
27 septembre 2011
The soldiers ordered them to stop, but as they were driving at high speed and the brakes had failed, they could not stop.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC000269406
17 novembre 2009
Relying both on Articles 5 § 4 and 13 of the Convention, they alleged that there was no effective remedy to challenge the lawfulness of their pre-trial detention and that the proceedings, by which they
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7212
19 octobre 2012
They claimed that children were verbally abused on their way to school and stopped and searched by the “MRT” police and border guards, who confiscated Latin script books when they found them and that in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620JUD000218612
20 juin 2023
The police officers had then taken out their guns, shouted to the man to stop and shot into the air, but the man had not stopped. They had chased him and G.S. had followed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0425JUD003646908
25 avril 2019
They surrounded the applicant and his bodyguards and then forcibly took them to one of the central statues on the square, where the applicant was ordered to sit on a bench surrounded only by SPD officers
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0210JUD003208419
10 février 2022
Even if they had been staying at these addresses, “there [had been] no logical reason for them to re ‑ enter Slovakia, which in their own submission had only been a transit station on their way
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211DEC001322406
11 février 2014
The applicants maintained that they were the owners of the minerals on their land and that, by refusing to grant them compensation for minerals extracted, the State violated their property
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626DEC004309216
26 juin 2018
They intended to submit these documents in new asylum requests to be lodged by them.
ECLI:CEDH:002-12710
14 janvier 2020
, on this basis alone, contain the actus reus and mens rea elements of the offence in issue (as these seemed to derive from the Supreme Court’s case-law) in respect of each of their authors, taken individually
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003JUD001500819
3 octobre 2024
They had also been informed of their rights and the reasons for their detention in English. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0712DEC000513271
12 juillet 1972
The Court held that it was necessary, in order to protect the interests of the children, that all four of them should be taken in charge for care outside their own home since the conditions there
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD005706700
16 décembre 2003
In the event of any finding of guilt, the Court hears mitigation and then retires (this time with the Judge Advocate present to advise them) to consider their sentence. ...” 53.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305DEC005788417
5 mars 2019
The applicants challenged their arrests on the grounds that there was no imminent breach of the peace; the decisions to arrest them were wholly disproportionate to any perceived threat, and their arrests
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CO00899
14 novembre 2018
marque et ceux utilisés par l'étiquette « Mango Kids » étaient différents, que « les dénominations verbales [respectivement employées] étaient très différentes », puisqu'il s'agissait de « Fingers in the