Private K.A. had been characterised as requiring “enhanced supervision”, but the authorities had not explained what that had meant in practice in terms of supervision and what measures that had involved

  The parties are asked to clarify what was the exact nature of the applicant’s strip search, and – more specifically – whether it included a body cavity search, and what were the injuries sustained

against the prosecutor or investigator in the course of the investigation, the Court considers that even though this remedy exists in theory as from 30   January 2003, the Government have not shown what

(ii)     What is the scope of review of the land registry concerning the use of notarised documents in real-estate transactions?

It is therefore unclear to what extent he relied on his rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in the domestic proceedings.

The Court then found that, in the specific circumstances of the case, it had not gone beyond what had been “necessary in a democratic society” for the following reasons.

Of course tapes of … conversations cannot possibly constitute any independent confirmation of what H. says about what the applicant had said to him previously, because, and you will understand the logic

    The allocation of shares to the applicants On 2 December 1993 the first applicant wrote to the Privatisation Agency enquiring what had been the expert valuation of the Brewery and what would

        At that moment the applicant intended to make a radio programme on what he had experienced during the meeting with S.

What was the exact scope of this right under Russian law? What was the exact wording by which such information was conveyed to the applicant?

He had not seen what had been written on them.

If so, what measures were taken to apprehend the perpetrators?

The person had to be truly conscious of the implications of what they were asking for and had to be protected against pressure and abuse.

What was the applicant’s procedural status?

I now regret what I did because I know I was wrong.” 22.

I told my mum what he had done to me. She told me that we could go to the police and there I told [them what happened] ... The first lady [the policewoman] there was good.

  The same applies to what was written on 5 May about the experience of a ‘26-year-old Bergen lady’.

She explained to M.I. what had happened to her.

Otherwise, subject to what I have said, you may do so. 5.