CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503DEC006884411
3 mai 2022
It follows that these complaints under Article 8 of the Convention should be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. 7.
Page 32 sur 851
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0611JUD007197201
11 juin 2009
Il invoqua également l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention. 24.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC005343299
5 octobre 2010
Their complaints under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention must therefore be rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies pursuant to Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention. B.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209978
16 avril 2021
Has the applicant company had a fair hearing in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in so far as similar actions before various domestic courts concerning the acceptance
ECLI:CEDH:001-244395
1 juillet 2025
Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention the applicant complains that she has been unlawfully deprived of her possessions.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327JUD001429603
27 mars 2008
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 TO THE CONVENTION 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410DEC004513106
10 avril 2012
Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-128025
9 octobre 2013
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention about the lack of medical assistance in detention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-185432
12 juillet 2018
Have the State authorities complied with their procedural obligations under Articles 3 and/or 8 of the Convention, taken alone and/or in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, concerning
ECLI:CEDH:001-110128
9 février 2012
in the Odessa police holding centre and the Kherson, Kakhovka and Mykolayiv ITTs; and - under Article 10 of the Convention that his conviction was connected to his journalistic activity
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1010DEC000842802
10 octobre 2006
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains that he was subjected to various forms of ill-treatment in police custody, in violation of Article 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0215DEC001279514
15 février 2018
Remaining complaints The applicant in application no. 33598/17 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0918DEC002869522
18 septembre 2025
The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-72601
22 février 2006
February 2006, at the 955th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies) The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of former Article 54 and of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection
ECLI:CEDH:001-241869
13 janvier 2025
5 § 1 of the Convention?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0206DEC002592218
6 février 2025
The applicants’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0522DEC002054419
22 mai 2025
The applicants’ various complaints under the Convention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations on the admissibility and merits in the application no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0514DEC006262611
14 mai 2013
The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of their civil proceedings.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD005457512
22 octobre 2020
Merits Article 5 § 1 of the Convention 11.
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-1145
19 janvier 2010
En janvier 2007, les requérants furent effectivement embarqués dans un avion à destination de Varsovie.