CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318DEC007225411

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2014

18 mars 2014

No further steps have been taken thereafter.

Source officielle

Page 33 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622JUD001840791

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2010

22 juin 2010

    In connection with this, the Court notes that the applicant's heirs have not introduced an autonomous claim concerning a potential violation of the property rights which they might have acquired

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD001401319

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2021

25 mars 2021

rent would amount to only double the – often miserly – rent which would have been payable under the Ordinance (see paragraph 16 above).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-159996

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2015

16 décembre 2015

    The facts of the case, as they have been submitted by the applicants, are similar to those presented in Association “21 December 1989” and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1212JUD001031904

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2013

12 décembre 2013

Any such failure would not necessarily have to mean that there has been an abuse of the right to petition.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318DEC001740208

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2014

18 mars 2014

Company’s application for a broadcasting licence had had fundamental defects which would have led to the licence being revoked and would have caused an untenable financial risk for the S.R. Company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC007679513

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2016

19 avril 2016

    Firstly, the Court notes that the relatives of the applicant have not lodged any complaints with the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006DEC005884209

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2015

6 octobre 2015

Therefore, this court did not have the opportunity to examine the question of a possible violation of human rights.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-140875

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2013

3 juillet 2013

did not pursue the best interests of the child in its finding and the paternity proceedings carried out before the domestic courts did not strike a fair balance between the right of the applicant to have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117JUD002968316

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2019

17 janvier 2019

    Under section 5 of the Personal Name Act, a person can apply to have his or her forename and family name changed. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116JUD004153498

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2007

16 janvier 2007

Contrary to the position in the case of Thompson v. the United Kingdom (no. 36256/97, 15 June 2004), the present applicant could have chosen a court-martial convened under the 1996 Act which would have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD003909313

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2014

17 avril 2014

The Committee is particularly concerned that all such acts have not yet been investigated and those responsible have not been prosecuted and punished (arts. 5 and 6).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0416JUD006889413

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2015

16 avril 2015

The Committee is particularly concerned that all such acts have not yet been investigated and those responsible have not been prosecuted and punished (arts. 5 and 6).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2016

15 novembre 2016

Most of them considered that the Constitutional Court should have dismissed the appeal as an actio popularis and should have refrained from expressing any views on the constitutionality of the legislation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205JUD001770904

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2006

5 décembre 2006

Furthermore, they pointed out that despite the interim measure of 16 February 2005 they have to date received no payment from the defendant at all. 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0303DEC006484801

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2005

3 mars 2005

I have often tried to have a serious conversation with my biological mother but she just wanted to keep things on a cosy [superficial] level. For the rest, I refer to what I have put in writing.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD002245615

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2018

11 décembre 2018

The applicants argued that had the Housing (Decontrol) Ordinance not been amended by Act XXII of 1979, the temporary emphyteusis on their apartment would have simply come to an end and they would have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117JUD003986602

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2005

17 novembre 2005

    Aleksandra Ivanovna Basova 28 March 2000 / the Kominternovskiy District Court of Voronezh 4,540.70 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408DEC002910007

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2014

8 avril 2014

    Furthermore, the Government stated that, as rightly pointed out by the Court of Cassation, it would have been possible for the drugs to have reached Sergio Marra even if all the prison authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1108DEC005512009

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2011

8 novembre 2011

The applicant did not have the necessary financial means for obtaining judicial review.

Source officielle