Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-890654-915267
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
The European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and ruled the other complaints inadmissible.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1843928-1935114
22 novembre 2006
22 novembre 2006
During the consultation held that day with medical staff, Ms Evans and her partner J were informed that they would each need to sign a form consenting to the treatment and that, in accordance with the
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68260-68728
6 juin 2000
6 juin 2000
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3, in view of the excessive length of his detention on remand (which lasted three-and-a-half years), and awarded Mr Český 10,000
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68237-68705
18 juillet 2000
18 juillet 2000
Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been no violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2300691-2473971
25 mars 2008
25 mars 2008
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2006701-2123413
22 mai 2007
22 mai 2007
The European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention because no oral hearing was held in the appeal proceedings.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1059533-1097014
27 juillet 2004
27 juillet 2004
He died in May 1999 while being held in a detention centre pending deportation.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2248232-2405855
29 janvier 2008
29 janvier 2008
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68295-68763
7 novembre 2000
7 novembre 2000
held, by six votes to one, that a finding of a violation constituted sufficient just satisfaction for non-pecuniary damage.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1965299-2077009
3 avril 2007
3 avril 2007
The Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2311914-2471672
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
Accordingly, the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 11.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-911016-936703
15 janvier 2004
15 janvier 2004
The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights; and a violation of Article 6
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2041756-2158467
19 juin 2007
19 juin 2007
No satisfactory explanation having been given to justify that delay, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1661096-1743404
4 mai 2006
4 mai 2006
Decision of the Court Article 3 The Court noted that the cell in which the applicant had been held measured 6 sq. m.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-505548-506894
26 février 2002
26 février 2002
A hearing was held on 14 June 2001 and, on the same day, the Chamber declared the application partly admissible.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-703060-711932
18 février 2003
18 février 2003
Accordingly, the Court held unanimously that there had been a breach of Article 8.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1789637-1877259
19 septembre 2006
19 septembre 2006
Consequently, the authorities could not be held responsible for his death. 2.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1664791-1744423
9 mai 2006
9 mai 2006
It therefore held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 8 in that regard.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-904124-929126
8 janvier 2004
8 janvier 2004
It further held that it was not necessary to examine separately Mrs İlkay ’s complaint under Article 13.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68195-68663
21 décembre 1999
21 décembre 1999
A hearing was held on 28 September 1999 in private.
Source officiellePage 33 sur 2440