In this respect he complained that the proceedings lasted a total of five years, eight months and fourteen days, of which the prosecutors’ investigation lasted two years, two months and seven days and

On the same date the Prosecutor of the ARC remanded the applicant in custody for two months. 10.

The proceedings before the administrative authorities lasted from 1 May 1993 until 27 October 2000, that is 7 years, 5 months and 27 days.

Two of the adjournments, which lasted a total of approximately four and a half months, were caused by the applicant.

The proceedings thus lasted eight years and almost eight months for three levels of jurisdiction. 41.

This constitutional principle means a prohibition on [being punished] twice for a single deed that is contrary to the law – that is to say, for the same criminal offence, as well as for the same violation

It relied on the same grounds as those given in its previous decisions and noted that the procedural action that had been taken had been the same as that listed in its previous decision (see paragraph

  On 17 January 1995 the Białystok Regional Court again adjourned a hearing on the same ground.   31.

It also decided to examine the merits of the remainder of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3 of the Convention). THE FACTS I.

  The proceedings thus lasted about eleven years and seven months.

The date for a new hearing must be set at the same time. A court cannot adjourn a case of its own motion unless necessary under particular circumstances. ...”

On the same day at around 3 p.m. the applicants were taken to the police station to give their statements.

While confirming the existence of the two circulars, they disputed their content while at the same time refusing – on the grounds that they were classified “State secret” – to disclose them to the European

Mr   Krivonosov further complained under Article   6   §§   1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) about the criminal proceedings against him having lasted for too long.

In both cases the Court unanimously found a violation of Article 5   §   3, Mr Çığdem’s and Mr Yalçin’s detention having lasted nine years and one month and eight years and nine months respectively

    On the same day,   the applicant was arrested by the police officers and taken to the Sabunchu District Police Station.

Under the same Article, she also complained about the outcome and the overall fairness of the proceedings.

    On 16 January, 20 March, 19 May, 17 July, 7 September and 6   November 2015 the Town Court extended the applicant’s pre-trial detention, referring to the same grounds as those in the

First of all, it was unclear why the investigator was not prepared to wait for the applicant to return to Moscow three days later, given that the investigation had already lasted several months and that

On 22 May 2007 the district court, referring to the same grounds as before, extended the applicant’s detention until 25 June 2007.