CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531JUD003724214
31 mai 2016
Croatia , no. 25782/11, §   67, 26 April 2016; and Perak v. Slovenia , no. 37903/09, §   50, 1   March   2016). B.     Costs and expenses 44.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013DEC000515812
13 octobre 2020
He stared at one spot after getting up; the day before the incident he could not assemble his mobile phone and put the SIM card in it because his hands were trembling.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0206JUD005644015
6 février 2024
    On 8 April 2005 the investigating judge ( rechter-commissaris ; “investigating judge E.”) at the Regional Court ( rechtbank ) of ‘s ‑ Hertogenbosch examined under oath a witness (“
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD005085910
27 juin 2013
These apparent contradictions have not yet been tested in court and, as a result, the legal situation of converts remains unclear.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD003423809
29 novembre 2016
    Au cours du mois de février 2007, la requérante évoqua avec D.V. des tranchants de couteau, à une ou deux reprises, ce que D.V. traduisit par «   une phobie d’impulsion ».
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD002153208
18 octobre 2011
Elle faisait l’objet d’un suivi psychologique en raison de ses troubles d’anxiété, de ses difficultés à retrouver le sommeil et d’une phobie avérée aux bruits.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 11
6979d639cdc6046d47f577cc
22 janvier 2026
psychiatre, a relevé que Mme [A] souffrait de perturbations psychoaffectives graves avec syndrome post-traumatique, incluant un état dépressif, une anxiété généralisée avec syndrome de répétition, phobies
5ème chambre sociale PH
67908b384143037ceabfc013
21 janvier 2025
situation de Mme [R], si la société Royal Canin soutient qu'elle n'a reçu aucune alerte avant le mois de janvier 2020, et que les entretiens professionnels de la salariée ne comportaient aucune alerte, il apparaît
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122671
20 juin 2013
There was also evidence of ‘phone calls between the applicant and his friend, which coincided with the deliveries, as well payments by the friend to a bank and then a transfer to the applicant’s account
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD002352414
30 juin 2020
    On 5 April 2013 a criminal investigator opened a criminal investigation into the theft of certain items from L.D.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC001459015
22 janvier 2019
The first applicant’s phone number was noted in that respect. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD002677103
12 juin 2008
Portugal , judgment of 22   April 1994, Series A no. 286-B, p. 38, § 33; and Morel v. France , no.   34130/96, § 40, ECHR 2000-VI). 44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC004916399
19 mai 2005
She had thus learned about the discontinuation only in April 2004, when receiving the Government's observations. In her view, the end of the period to be taken into consideration was thus April 2004.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0704JUD006290315
4 juillet 2019
She added that he always took her mobile phone away from her and sometimes locked her in their apartment so that she could not leave. 16 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023JUD002360816
23 octobre 2018
She sent him an email on 30   April 2013, indicating her whereabouts. According to the first applicant, she did not leave an address and did not answer her mobile phone.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004361102
15 octobre 2015
4   April 2001, further remanded the applicant in custody.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC007341110
29 mars 2016
It appears that this became final on 16 April 2009. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC000119510
10 juillet 2012
Amongst other things, a new mobile phone was acquired right before the importation, there were extensive telephone communications between the group and [the applicant] and a number of other persons in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0722JUD003964798
22 juillet 2003
On 7   April 1995 the applicant was convicted in Snaresbrook Crown Court of possessing a Class   A drug with intent to supply and was sentenced to nine years' imprisonment. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0531JUD002395494
31 mai 2001
The grounds for this conclusion were not apparent.
Page 33 sur 38