ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 23.

The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that her land was used for various electricity facilities, without compensation.

Invoking Article 8 of the Convention taken alone and, in substance, also in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, the applicant complains that the domestic court failed to undertake a complex

  sur la violation alléguée de l’article 6 § 1 de la convention 43.

Relying on Article 3 of the Convention (applications nos.   23325/22, 23377/22 and 4620/23), the applicants complain of their conditions of detention in Monsanto HSP.

They invoke Article   3 and/or Article   13 (applications nos.   25697/08, 44047/09, 13577/16, 31750/16, 16810/17, 38328/17 and 69370/17) of the Convention in this respect. 3.

Accordingly, there has been a violation of Article 11 of the Convention. ALLEGED VIOLATION of article 14 in conjunction with articles 10 and 11 of the Convention 32.

The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the

Their attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.

Azerbaijan (no. 38798/07, §§ 18-24, 22   April   2010). THE LAW I.     ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 TO THE CONVENTION 11.

  34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated

24 § 2 of the Convention.

  2015/23, had violated Article 6 of the Convention. 24.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of the Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the delayed enforcement of the binding and enforceable judgment

droit, de dénaturation, de méconnaissance du droit à un procès équitable et du principe d'impartialité, tels qu'ils sont garantis par l'article 6 de la convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de

Il invoque l'article   6 §§ 1 et 3 de la Convention.

    In application no. 38840/14, the applicant also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 13.

the Convention found by the Court in this case concerns the discriminatory suspension of pensions of certain former military judges (violation of Article 14 combined with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1) (