, in the latter case, the offender had to prove the truth of the statement concerned.

  The applicant's husband had never had any enemies.

  Initially they stated that the village had merely been searched and that no damage had been caused.

It had been reported to him that there had been a contact with the PKK during the night.

As far as Unity of Judges specifically was concerned, V.M. had written that so-called “cancelled ballots” had been used to prevent members of that organisation who had successfully passed the competency

as oral testimony, which has been submitted.

  He complained that neither he nor his lawyer had been present when the District Court had heard his son in the presence of the mother, and that the court had not heard him in person.

officer had delegated his or her powers.

had delegated his or her powers.

The appeal had also to be allowed if there was a material irregularity in the course of the trial. In any other case, the appeal had to be dismissed.   44.

officer had delegated his or her powers.

The appeal had also to be allowed if there was a material irregularity in the course of the trial. In any other case, the appeal had to be dismissed.   45.

officer had delegated his or her powers.

The appeal had also to be allowed if there was a material irregularity in the course of the trial. In any other case, the appeal had to be dismissed.   45.

The appeal had also to be allowed if there was a material irregularity in the course of the trial. In any other case, the appeal had to be dismissed.   45.

  When his party friends had been arrested in 1990, he had fled Syria.

The appeal had also to be allowed if there was a material irregularity in the course of the trial. In any other case, the appeal had to be dismissed.   45.

that he had committed a crime.

officer had delegated his or her powers.