He does submit that his sentence was excessive when compared to the sentences imposed on his co-conspirators in the Netherlands.

Before applying to the European Court, they had lodged claims with the domestic courts under the 2004 Act.

    The Government contended that the claim was unsubstantiated. 20.

    The Government contested the claims. 18.

  The Court granted an increase which varied between AS 200 and AS 1550 per month and dismissed the remainder of her claims.

    The applicant brought a civil claim, arguing that her dismissal had been unlawful. She sought damages and reinstatement in her post.

    Generally, the Government did not dispute the facts submitted by the applicant, except for his claims to the effect that all of the offences in question had been committed before the entry

  Russia), relies on Article 3 of the Convention to claim that termination of his pension as his only source of income, constitute a degrading treatment.

l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller CHANUT, les observations de la société civile professionnelle VINCENT et OHL, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

For this reason, so she claims, she has been discriminated against as compared with contractors without such affiliations. In this respect she invokes Article 14 of the Convention.

Sur le rapport de Mme le conseiller référendaire AGOSTINI, les observations de la société civile professionnelle WAQUET, FARGE et HAZAN, avocat en la Cour, et les conclusions de Mme l'avocat général COMMARET

As to the pending appeal proceedings, the Government claim that the applicant has failed to exhaust an efficient domestic remedy, which is available to him.

;       Since then the applicants have sought to negotiate with the LEA to secure an alternative form of education for St. other than in a segragated school where, they claim

xa0;     Since then the applicants have sought to negotiate with the LEA to secure an alternative form of education for Lydia other than in a segregated special school where, they claim

  COMPLAINTS           The applicant claims to be a victim of a violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention which, in his view, guarantees the

On 18/06/2020 the Regional Court granted the first applicant’s claim.

the applicant could now most probably enforce his claim for supplementary commissions before the civil courts. b.

The Government contested that claim. 35.

    The Office of the Prosecutor General dismissed the applicant’s claim.