In his application to the European Court the applicant complained that following his arrest the police had denied him access to a lawyer (G.M.) his parents had hired to represent him, that he had therefore

According to the applicant, during his detention at the Sumy SIZO police officers visited him on a number of occasions trying to force him to maintain his initial self-incriminating statements.

Y..., né le [...] , commandant de bord sur Airbus A330, s'est porté volontaire pour un stage de qualification sur divers appareils au cours de la saison hiver 2010-2011, sans qu'il soit retenu, et ce au

réparation de leur préjudice ; Attendu que, pour retenir contre l'ACCA une faute et la condamner avec son assureur à réparer les dommages causés aux victimes, la cour d'appel, après avoir constaté que l'hiver

When S.’s solicitor came to see him, he advised him that he could see a doctor at that point without jeopardising his chance of bail at the imminent hearing.

His working conditions were such as to allow him to carry out his routine work safely.

They forced him into a car and drove him out of town. Then, while the others pinned him down, V.S. repeatedly inserted a sharpened stake into his anus.

    The applicant complained under Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention that his arrest, his transportation to Russia and his extradition to Bulgaria were unlawful and that his arrest amounted

By failing to inform him of the actual charge against him at the beginning of the proceedings, the authorities had in practice negated his defence rights.

Instead, they wrote to his representative on 24 December 2009, informing him that his letter had been received and that the applicant had been “given explanations as regards his legal representation before

the alleged facts which were related to him.

He complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention of the infringement of his right to be present at the court during the proceedings and to defend himself in person, and of his inability to appeal his

On 29 July 2000 the applicant asked the Lithuanian authorities to restore his property rights to 9.5705 hectares of his father’s land in Vilnius by giving him a new plot of land.

However, in early 2009, the social welfare authorities arrived with the police to fetch the applicant and to take him back, against his will, to his home town.

After his arrival at the police office, the head of the police office had a “prophylactic” conversation with him.

He also complains that the court decisions denying him access to his children at Christmas 1992 violated his right to respect for his family life.

The applicant asserted that his former representative had told him in a letter of 18   December 1998 that the proceedings could take some time and that he would keep him informed of developments in

Police Officer R. ran after him, caught him and attempted to stop him grasping him by his left shoulder.

In particular, they had put plastic bags filled with cigarette smoke over his head, twisted his fingers, stepped on his hands with their feet, beaten him, punched him while pressing a book against his