The proceedings before that court lasted approximately two years and eight months.

The row lasted about five minutes, after which [the first applicant] was brought to [the police station].

He chiefly relied on the same arguments as before. On an unspecified date in April, May or June 2002 the judge-rapporteur rejected the request, giving exactly the same reasons as earlier. 29 .

At the same time, the first applicant submitted that he had seen S. for the last time on 12 June 2005.

  Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the Court found that the applicant’s pre-trial detention, which had lasted three years and six months, was in breach of the requirements of Article

The impugned proceedings had lasted for a period of eight years and ten months at the time of communication and are still pending before the Ankara Commercial Court as of November 2011.

However, in the applicant’s case, registered medicines would have had the same curative effects and, given the evidence produced during the proceedings (submissions of the parties and witnesses, expert

On 6 December 2000 the Crimea Supreme Court quashed that judgment finding that the court of first instance had misapplied law and remitted the case for a fresh consideration to the same court.

  The same day the applicants lodged a complaint alleging ill-treatment with the Şemdinli public prosecutor, who took statements from them.

    The applicant complained that the proceedings had lasted an unreasonably long time. He relied on Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention.

On the same day, the applicants were taken into police custody. 7.

That part of the proceedings lasted approximately 3 years and 3 months for one degree. 72.

It therefore lasted five years and six months for four levels of jurisdiction.

  The judgment was read out in open court in the presence of the applicant on the same date.

  The Court observed that the proceedings had lasted more than ten years and 11   months for the investigation stage alone.

    On the same date the District Court convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to six months' imprisonment.

They therefore lasted at least four years and seven months for three court levels.

March 1967, and lasted until .. June 1967, when the Court passed judgment on all the defendants.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29   §   3). THE FACTS 4.

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that the criminal proceedings against him had lasted unreasonably long. 4.