ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 8.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 4 OF THE CONVENTION 23.

The applicant invokes Article 5   §   4 of the Convention in this respect.

    Article 303 made it a crime for investigators, prosecutors and defence attorneys to forge evidence. COMPLAINTS 22.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 14.     Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.

    Relying on Article 13 of the Convention in conjunction with the above complaint, the applicant complains that the domestic proceedings were ineffective. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 18.

14 in conjunction with Article 8 (art. 14+8) of the Convention;        - held, unanimously, that the question of the application of Article 50 (art. 50) was not ready for decision

In some of the applications, they further acknowledged a violation of Article   13 of the Convention.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of pre-trial detention were communicated to the Hungarian Government (“the Government”).

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 16.

  31367/20 the applicant also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention. 12.

    The applicant also complained under Article 6 § 3 (b), (c) and (d) of the Convention about various procedural violations.

The applicant in case no. 20243/15 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

to the Council of Europe in light of Article 58 of the European Convention on Human Rights” adopted on 22 March 2022).

  17599/05) delivered on 22 October 2009, in particular to the finding under Article 46 of the Convention that overcrowding in Polish prisons and remand centres revealed a structural problem, Having

Elle cite l’article 1 du Protocole n o 1 à la Convention ainsi libellé   : «   Toute personne physique ou morale a droit au respect de ses biens.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).

The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the