CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1004JUD002722814
4 octobre 2018
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0109JUD005257111
9 janvier 2020
    It follows that there has been a violation in the present case of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention. 82.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0427JUD000357109
27 avril 2017
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3(d) OF THE CONVENTION 41.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1115JUD001216704
15 novembre 2012
;Article 6-3-c - Se défendre avec l'assistance d'un défenseur)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0515JUD006365511
15 mai 2014
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 AND § 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1128JUD001262987
28 novembre 1991
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 PARA. 3 (c) (art. 6-3-c) 46.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1204JUD001641206
4 décembre 2014
Article 6 § 3 (d) enshrines the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all evidence against him must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing with a view to adversarial argument
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-5183
24 septembre 2002
Royaume-Uni - 32771/96 Arrêt 24.9.2002 [Section IV] Article 6 Article 6-3-e Assistance gratuite d'un interprète Requérant ne bénéficiant pas d’un interprète à l’audience de fixation de la peine: violation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD005850118
27 octobre 2022
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512JUD000821110
12 mai 2020
Turkey , (no. 25253/08, §§   41 ‑ 6, 19   February 2019). THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD000070516
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention 6.     The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD000469519
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention 6.     The applicant complained of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witness Zh.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD000215610
25 juillet 2017
Il y voit une violation de l’article 6 §§ 1 et 3 b), c) et d), ainsi libellé   : «   1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1206JUD001855013
6 décembre 2018
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD001317518
He relied on Article   6 §§   1 and   3 (d) of the Convention, which reads as follows: Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD001709204
14 novembre 2013
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE 6 § 3 (c) THEREOF 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD004204619
They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention, which reads, in so far as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1025JUD002344412
25 octobre 2016
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD002758207
28 janvier 2020
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1027JUD004549718
He relied on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention, which reads, in so far as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ...
Page 34 sur 58499
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.