CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14002
17 janvier 2023
of the legislation by the Constitutional Court, which held it to be proportionate.
Page 34 sur 1490
Service des référés
67100402fac14a1f31d9b81b
16 octobre 2024
] 2 Copies exécutoires 3 copies conformes 1 copie parquet 1 copie Conseil Constitutionnel délivrées le : 1 copie dossier JUGEMENT DE REFUS DE TRANSMISSION DE LA QUESTION PRIORITAIRE DE CONSTITUTIONNALITE
ECLI:CEDH:002-14439
11 février 2025
following a relevant judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) on a request for a preliminary ruling by the Constitutional Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0617JUD003973415
17 juin 2021
complaint • Issues of “constitutionality” or “compatibility” did not arise as life imprisonment without possibility of release on parole part of the constitutional legal order STRASBOURG 17 June
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1121DEC002524020
21 novembre 2023
If, while assessing the constitutionality of the draft constitutional amendments from the perspective of conformity with the unamendable articles of Constitution, the Constitutional Court declares
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC005011599
4 mai 2000
On 4 June 1994 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint alleging that the decisions of the administrative bodies and the Administrative Court violated his constitutional rights.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0523DEC007982112
23 mai 2017
However, Article 5 of the Constitution, according to the well-established case-law of the Constitutional Court, does not provide for individual rights given that it stipulates the basic principles of constitutionality
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0905DEC003295796
5 septembre 2000
It found that the 1991 amendment had been properly published and that there was no reason for applying to the Constitutional Court ( Verfassungsgerichtshof ) for a review of the constitutionality of that
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0110DEC001782091
10 janvier 1995
, a decision on the constitutionality of the Allotment Garden Act could not be expected before 1991.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144964
21 mai 2014
The applicant submitted a constitutional complaint to the Constitutional Court, claiming that the termination of his position violated the rule of law, the prohibition of retroactive legislation and his
ECLI:CEDH:001-224585
5 avril 2023
The proceedings before the first instance court were stayed pending the decision of the Constitutional Court which, on 24 January 2018, had been asked legal questions as regards the constitutionality of
ECLI:CEDH:001-224584
694605fd75782d5f06dbd800
16 décembre 2025
56972 - N° Portalis 352J-W-B7J-DBCLT N° : 1/MM QPC déposée le : 17 Octobre 2025 [1] [1] 2 Copies exécutoires délivrées le: ORDONNANCE DE REFUS DE TRANSMISSION DE LA QUESTION PRIORITAIRE DE CONSTITUTIONNALITE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD003828010
23 octobre 2012
The Court observes that section 64 of the Constitutional Court Act provides for a thirty-day time-limit within which a constitutional complaint has to be lodged with the Constitutional Court
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119JUD002835711
19 novembre 2013
On 2 October 2009 the applicant lodged a constitutional appeal. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211JUD001409010
11 février 2014
Constitutional Court Act 1993 and the Constitutional Court’s practice 25.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD003943417
20 octobre 2020
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Constitutional proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD002146308
Constitutional complaint 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1126JUD003363717
26 novembre 2019
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD008105717
14 janvier 2025
The applicant lodged a constitutional complaint on 9 June 2021.