of the European Court of Human Rights in the Polizzi case against Italy delivered on 12 October 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Marcotrigiano case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

of the European Court of Human Rights in the R. case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Alfredo Caruso case delivered on 5 October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Brunno case delivered on 28 September 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Milazzotto case against Italy delivered on 27 February 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Roselli Italo IV case delivered on 15 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling

46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits

46, paragraphe 2, de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales, qui prévoit que le Comité surveille l’exécution des arrêts définitifs de la Cour européenne des droits

by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 26 June 2003, within the time-limit agreed to under the terms

by the Committee of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 15 mars 2002, after the expiry of the time-limit agreed to

Court of Human Rights in the Real Alves case delivered on 7June 2005 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Sahli case delivered on 9 January 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Dionyssios   Petrotos delivered on 29 February 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Benzan case delivered on 8 November 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Gür case delivered on 24 July 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

of Ministers concerning the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;   Having satisfied itself that on 13 May 2004, after the expiry of the time-limit agreed to under the terms

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Carnasciali case delivered on 29 January 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

Court of Human Rights in the Moreira Barbosa case delivered on 21 December 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the