He explained that T.B. owed him money, which he tried to recover by searching his pockets.

He also submitted that the prohibition on him using any of the money in his bank accounts precluded him from meeting his basic needs, such as buying food and medication, paying rent, taxes and social security

They also hit his head against a wall and extinguished cigarettes on his body.

went as far as to prevent him from communicating with his family.

After his arrest, the applicant’s phone was searched by the police based on a consent form signed by him.

Lastly, his psychological problems were not linked to his military service and did not derive from any debasing treatment that might have been inflicted on him by other soldiers or by his superiors.

They forced him into a chair and held him by the neck while an army officer held his mouth open and stuffed brown paper in it.

He had been addressed by a young man whom he did not know, who told him that he had been dragged off his scooter and that his scooter had been taken from him; this had happened less than a minute earlier

The police ordered the applicant to place his hands on the roof of the car to search him and verify his identity.

In the applicant’s submission, the presiding judge informed him of the telephone conversation with his doctor prior to questioning him for the first time on his fitness to plead.

It reads as follows: “The applicant stated that after he had refused to go to a cell the director of the detention centre hit him on his left leg with the truncheon.

In the extradition proceedings the applicant claimed that his extradition to Poland would subject him to the risk of ill-treatment due to his physical and mental condition.

       The applicant further submits that the prohibition order imposed on him interfered with his rights to freedom of religion and expression as guaranteed by Articles 9 and

: violation Facts – In his application to the European Court the applicant complained that he had been forced to serve his prison sentence far from his home, with the result that his elderly mother, who

The applicant had hit him with the same stool and stabbed him with the knife. Subsequently, the applicant had thrown away the knife, the broken legs of the stool and his blood-stained T-shirt. 13.

He alleged that the staff had forcefully immobilised him, twisted his arms, strangled him and pushed him to the floor. As a result he suffered the hematomas and broken elbow bone.

  Moreover, his wife, who was an Austrian civil servant, could not be expected to follow him to Nigeria.

Upon his arrival at the police station, they took him to the basement and continued beating him.

  In particular, he complains that the courts lacked the authority to try him as the deadline for committing him for trial had expired, that his defence lawyer failed in his duty to protest against