The Convention also refers to the quality of the law, requiring it to be compatible with the rule of law, a concept inherent in all the Articles of the Convention (see, amongst other authorities, Kafkaris

Italy (dec.), no. 45291/06, §§ 293-294, 8 December 2009; Kafkaris v. Cyprus (dec.), no. 9644/09, § 68, 21 June 2011; Kuppinger v. Germany , no.

necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum; furthermore, legal costs are recoverable only in so far as they relate to the violation found (see, as recent authorities among many others, Kafkaris

relevant texts of the Council of Europe and other international legal texts concerning the imposition and reviewing of life sentences, and the importance to be attached to rehabilitation, are set out in Kafkaris

as regards detention governed by Article 5 § 1 (a) of the Convention, save where the grounds justifying the person’s deprivation of liberty are susceptible to change with the passage of time (see Kafkaris

applicant’s administrative detention in reality formed part of his detention as a criminal suspect, but without the requisite safeguards for his procedural rights, notably the right to defence (see Kafkaris

  the United Kingdom , no. 53236/99, § 65, 10 December 2002; and Kafkaris v.   Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 117, ECHR 2008 ‑ ...).

of the courts’ interpretation of it and after taking appropriate legal advice, what acts and omissions will make him or her criminally liable and what penalty he or she faces on that account (see Kafkaris

It prohibits in absolute terms torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, irrespective of the circumstances and the victim's behaviour (see, as a recent reference, Kafkaris v.

    In the case of Kafkaris v.

differences in treatment that have as their basis or reason a personal characteristic (“status”) by which persons or a group of persons are distinguishable from each other (see, as a recent authority, Kafkaris

Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, §   40, ECHR 2000 ‑ IV; and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 159, ECHR 2008 ‑ ...; and Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no.

November 2001 the director of R.L., O.V., submitted a writ of execution of the said decision to the Riga City Vidzeme District Bailiffs’ Office ( Rigas pilsētas Vidzemes priekšpilsētas Tiesu izpildītāju kantoris

  46295/99, § 63, ECHR 2002 ‑ IV, and Kafkaris v. Cyprus   [GC], no.   21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008).

France , 18   December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111; and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, §   116, ECHR 2008). 87.

It also refers to the quality of the law, requiring it to be compatible with the rule of law, a concept inherent in all the Articles of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Kafkaris v.

  the   United Kingdom [GC], no. 46295/99, § 63, ECHR 2002 ‑ IV; and Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 116, ECHR 2008).

  39029/97 , 6 July 1999;   Kafkaris v.   Cyprus   (dec.), no.   9644/09 , § 68, 21 June 2011; and Harkins v. the United Kingdom   (dec.) [GC], no.

Turkey 28/08/2020 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 40 48982/20 Kanak v.

    The Court reiterates that an application will generally fall foul of this Article where it has the same factual basis as a previous application (see Kafkaris v.