that Falkefjell Ltd was responsible for a delay from July to October 1974 in the delivery of the ship, indicating certain amounts for compensation (between 6,000,000 and 18,900,000   Norwegian kroner

    The applicant company was represented by Knoflach, Kroker, Tonini & Partner, a law firm in Innsbruck.

Belgium judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 214-C, p. 95, § 44; the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, § 30; Elsholz v.

According to surveys made by the customs and tax authorities, approximately 1,600   companies with a total tax debt exceeding 2 billion Danish kroner (DKK) were stripped in the period from the late

Furthermore, a child born of such a relationship is ipso jure part of that “family unit” from the moment of its birth and by the very fact of it (see Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands , 27 October 1994

According to surveys made by the customs and tax authorities, approximately one thousand six hundred companies with a total tax debt exceeding two   billion   Danish kroner (DKK) were stripped

Dans son arrêt du 16 novembre 1990 (NJ 1991, n o 475), cité dans l’arrêt Kroon et autres c.

By judgment of 13 August   1998 the High Court granted the applicant compensation in the amount of 151,087.90 Danish kroner (DKK) as it found it established that the applicant was not aware of the

As a result, a pupil at a private school in Denmark did not generally pay an annual fee in excess of 1,200 kroner.

the Õru District Administration decided to award compensation to the applicants in respect of the nationalised property in the form of “privatisation vouchers” to the nominal value of 63,150 Estonian kroons

Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 120, ECHR 2000 ‑ I, see also Berger ‑ Krall and Others v. Slovenia , no. 14717/04, § 198, 12 June 2014, Megadat.com S.r.l. v.

By judgment of 28   May   1997 the City Court in Fjerritslev convicted the applicant and sentenced him to pay a fine of 68,000   Danish   kroner (DKK).

The accounts were submitted on 17 September and 26 November 1993, and as they were comprehensive the expenses incurred thereby amounted to more than 17   million Danish kroner (DKK).

    The applicant claimed 720,708 Estonian kroons (EEK) for pecuniary damage and EEK 1,500,000 for non-pecuniary damage (46,199 and 96,156 euros (EUR), respectively), that he suffered in connection

Eastern Denmark ( Østre   Landsret ), requesting that the former be ordered to acknowledge that it was liable to pay compensation for pain and suffering in the amount of 450,000   Danish kroner

Krall , Rechtsanwalt,   Counsel . The Court heard their addresses as well as their replies to its questions. The Government and the applicant produced documents at the hearings. THE FACTS 8.

Vincent Kraal, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam.   3      The application is directed against the Netherlands, whose Government are represented by their Agent, Mr.

Subsequently, according to Kleindienst, they celebrated this coup over boiled beef in the Plachutta restaurant together with a Krone reporter.

notion of “family life” in Article 8 is not confined solely to marriage-based relationships but may also encompass other de facto “family ties” where sufficient constancy is present (see, for example, Kroon

was formally charged with tax asset stripping allegedly having been committed in six cases during the spring of 1993 with a risk of loss to the Treasury of approximately thirty million Danish   kroner