He lost his job and his attempts to work again were not successful; because of the pain in his damaged leg he was not able to react promptly while driving, and got into a traffic accident. 2.

    In the present case, therefore, the Court concludes that the applicant has not lost his status as a “victim” for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention. 30.

However, since according to the Maltese legal context, the applicants have to date not lost ownership of the property, the Court considers it appropriate to base itself on the value of the land when the

However, by that time the company in which the share belonged had been liquidated – as of July 1997 – and the share had lost its value altogether. 8.

Therefore, the Government claimed that the total amount of lost rent should be reduced by an estimated sum of USD   7,359 for the expenses that the applicant would inevitably have incurred for the

After the decision of 8   December   2000 had become final, the applicant lost all possibility to control the company during the winding up process. 36.

On 20 December 2000 Pavel Levinţa asked the Prosecutor General to have his arm examined by a doctor since he had allegedly lost all movement in it as a result of the ill-treatment by the police on 4 November

In 1981, having lost her Soviet passport, the applicant was given a new passport; she found the lost passport in 1989 but did not return it to the relevant authorities.

The court based its judgment on the Republic of Estonia Principles of Property Reform Act which provides that unlawfully expropriated property is not subject to return if the property has lost its former

dismissed the action, with reference to Section 8 (1) of the Extra-Judicial Rehabilitations Act, on the ground that the property in question had been substantially re-built as a result of which it had lost

He alleges that he was beaten up by police officers following his arrest, as a result of which he lost consciousness; the Government deny this and it is not reflected in any police report.

The Government pleaded mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013

Then he hit the applicant in the neck with his elbow; as a result, the applicant lost consciousness.

As a result of this ill-treatment, and not because of the injury caused by the gunshot wound, he practically lost his eyesight.

Before the trial, part of the documentation concerning the management of the company by the applicant had been lost, when the receiver’s cellars were flooded.

The Government pleaded that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no.

In 1981, having lost her Soviet passport, the applicant was given a new passport; she found the lost passport in 1989 but did not return it to the relevant authorities.

She stopped communicating with other children, became reserved, lost her vivaciousness, started to have difficulties speaking and developed a tremor affecting the face and limbs.

  The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.