On the same day, the applicant's lawyer requested the court to amend the trial records.

It also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29 §   3).

1993 the applicant requested the Pension Insurance Office ( Pensionsversicherungsanstalt für Arbeiter ) retroactively to increase his widower’s pension, claiming that as a widower he should receive the same

A pre-trial investigation was opened immediately after the arson attack and lasted approximately seven months before being suspended. A neighbour was suspected, but no evidence could be found.

The suspension lasted five months.

The strike actions lasted between 11 and 67   days.

Complaints under Article   13 of the Convention, based on the same facts, were also communicated.

Law : Article 6 § 1:   The proceedings had lasted about five years, of which about four years and two months fell within the Court’s jurisdiction ratione temporis .

The questioning lasted fourteen hours and throughout that time she was denied access to a lawyer.

At 8.30 p.m. the same day she was taken again to the operating room as she had been bleeding heavily.

The applicants alleged that the Izmir Administrative Court rejected their claim for compensation on the basis of the report drawn up by three experts who were working in the same department as the doctors

municipality, who was the applicant’s employer, discussed the applicant’s situation at the meetings of 2 and 4 October 2018, where views were expressed that the applicant’s removal from her post which lasted

While the Hague Convention proceedings were ongoing in Poland, on 18   December 2015 the same court granted exclusive custody rights over O.H. to the applicant.

On the same date the Kirovograd City Prosecutor ordered his detention on remand until 2   December   1997.

The Constitutional Court adopted the same view in a decision of 18 April 2000.

On the same date the applicant was called an ambulance in the course of a court hearing. He was given some painkillers.

The third attempt to remove her was unsuccessful for the same reason.

On 11 February 1997 the District Court suspended the proceedings on the ground that other proceedings were pending before the same court which could have had an impact on the present proceedings.

In the alternative she claimed the same amount of compensation from the bank and the lawyers.

She filed a request with the police to that end on the same date.