Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2136654-2268128
4 octobre 2007
4 octobre 2007
The Court held by five votes to two that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1664745-1747191
9 mai 2006
9 mai 2006
The prosecution could not therefore be regarded as having ensured that the cause of death was established and that those responsible were held to account.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1162568-1212099
19 octobre 2004
19 octobre 2004
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2324926-2495941
8 avril 2008
8 avril 2008
Turkey (No. 2), the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (right to liberty and security) on account of the length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-914336-940159
27 janvier 2004
27 janvier 2004
Lastly, he complained under Article 10 of a breach of his right to freedom of expression The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1, Article
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68180-68648
16 janvier 2001
16 janvier 2001
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68360-68828
13 février 2001
13 février 2001
In each case, the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court) of the European Convention on Human
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1725987-1809701
5 juillet 2006
5 juillet 2006
On 13 June 2000 the Administrative Court held that an oral hearing was manifestly unnecessary in the matter because both parties had submitted all the necessary information in writing.
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-616052-621165
24 septembre 2005
24 septembre 2005
France (n° 61166/00, decision of 12 June 2001) it had held that, having regard to the developments in the domestic case-law, an application under Article L.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-962567-992381
30 mars 2004
30 mars 2004
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1, concerning the first set of proceedings and, by six votes to one, concerning the second.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1318845-1375974
26 avril 2005
26 avril 2005
He has been in prison for 41 years and is currently being held in Bapaume Prison (France).
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3176143-3545991
29 juin 2010
29 juin 2010
In a judgment of 24 November 2009, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68230-68698
5 décembre 2000
5 décembre 2000
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1. The judgment is available only in French. Section 3 (8) Motière v.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1013349-1047663
27 mai 2004
27 mai 2004
The applicant claims that, at the hearings held during that period, the public prosecutor’s office summoned witnesses against him, questioned witnesses and produced other evidence against him.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-616594-621713
19 septembre 2002
19 septembre 2002
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68218-68686
11 juillet 2000
11 juillet 2000
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68455-68923
10 novembre 1999
10 novembre 1999
The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of the right to property, guaranteed under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-630559-635985
9 octobre 2002
9 octobre 2002
A Chamber hearing was held on 16 October 2001 and the case was declared admissible the same day.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-878561-901949
19 novembre 2003
19 novembre 2003
His health is deteriorating, and he has now been held at Batumi, in a cell for remand prisoners at the local security ministry, for nearly three years.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-424017-424403
2 octobre 2001
2 octobre 2001
It also held that the individual applicants and other members of the applicant church were free to practice their religion within the Metropolitan Church of Moldova.
Source officiellePage 36 sur 2440