Then his mother-in-law, who worked at a hospital, had obtained a medical report for his wife and that report had led to his detention for no reason.

In his claim he provided an account of the alleged events, stating that his fellow servicemen Vl., Kats., Zai., Ryb., Mal. and Fed. could confirm the facts of his ill-treatment and “hazing”. 24.

    In challenging his conviction he repeated his arguments concerning the involuntary nature of his confession, the circumstances in which it had been taken and the violation of his right to

The scratches and traces on his body were a result of having attempted to break his handcuffs, and he had hit his head on the floor.

MJA en la personne de Maître [K] [R], ès qualités de Liquidateur de la société AJ PRESSE, [Adresse 1] [Localité 10] Représentée par Me Béatrice HIEST NOBLET de la SCP HYEST et ASSOCIES, avocat au

They beat the applicant on his face while he was handcuffed.

detention or after his release.

he had in fact been requesting them to communicate to him the reasons for his discharge.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

persistent interruptions, his failure to let Michael Stark answer questions, or his treating one or more innocuous comments by Mr Stark as an insult.

  He delivered his opinion on 30 June 1983.

his complaints.

Nature de l'affaire : Demande d'indemnités liées à la rupture du contrat de travail CDI ou CDD, son exécution ou inexécution Date de saisine : 12 septembre 2025 Décision attaquée : n° 24/04964 rendue

  On 28 July 1983, the second applicant lost his right to practise as a panel doctor and closed his practice afterwards.

  Before the Commission he is represented by his lawyer, Dr. Friedrich Schwank.

He complained specifically about the conduct of his defending officer, and under Article 6 § 3(c) about the failure to provide legal representation for his court martial.

The applicant appealed against this decision, arguing that his family situation, his health and his previous positive reference required his release pending the proceedings.

One of these conditions required the applicant to leave his residence only accompanied by his son, between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. and 3   p.m. and 6 p.m., in order to accompany his son to and from school

his front teeth were broken. 13 .

He knew about the assassination of his son near his house from what his son had told him previously.