Referring to the Court's case-law in this area (notably Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium , no.

whether the domestic legal provisions in question were sufficiently accessible and precise in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness in relation to deprivation of liberty (see Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki

United Kingdom , 28 October 1998, § 116, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ VIII; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001 ‑ V; Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki

restraints on the scope of their action to investigate crime and bring offenders to justice, including the guarantees contained in Articles   5 and 8 of the Convention (see Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki

    On 19 October 2011 the applicant and S.N. concluded a down ‑ payment agreement (kontratë kapari) according to which the applicant deposited just under half of the sale price as a down-payment

present case, the Court concludes that they disclose a violation of Article 5 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention in the light of its findings in the following judgments (see   Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki

  Halperin-Kaddari, a lawyer practising in Israel.

applicants considerable distress and feeling of humiliation to such a degree as to amount to degrading treatment prohibited under Article 3 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki

  71127/01, §   65, 12 June 2008, and Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v.   Belgium , no. 13178/03, § 83, ECHR 2006-XI).

    By a decision of 11 November 2014 the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) dismissed the applicant’s complaint and fully upheld the decisions in question

    On 15 November 2004 the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) allowed the applicant’s action and ordered the debtor to demolish the constructions. 8

    According to “the record of the applicant’s bringing-in” drafted by the arresting police officers H.K. and E.K., the applicant was “brought in” to Kanaker-Zeytun Police Station (hereafter

After leaving Polynesia on 3 March 1986 (see paragraph 13 above), Mrs Piermont travelled to New Caledonia at the invitation of local elected representatives, including the President of the Socialist Kanak

    68108/12 29/08/2012 Ahmet KANAK 01/04/1965 Ankara   Kaya YELEK On 1 April 2009 criminal proceedings were initiated against the applicant, an officer in the Army, for smuggling.

    By a decision of 18 March 2016 the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan upheld the applicant’s complaint, finding that the investigation after the resumption of the proceedings

    On 15 June 2010 the applicant contested P.’s decision to stay the proceedings before the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”).

    On 5 March 2008 the applicant was formally charged and brought before the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan.

As an alternative to Uniforma, I proposed to V.B. the candidacy of the Kanaker Sewing Factory, which is known in the Republic for sewing unforms for the Ministry of Defence, law enforcement agencies and

    On 14 November 2012 the applicants disputed the decision to terminate the proceedings (see paragraph 32 above) before the Arabkir and Kanaker-Zeytun District Court of Yerevan (“the District