CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0317JUD001566913
17 mars 2020
The Court reiterates that the mere fact that a detainee has been seen by a doctor and prescribed a certain form of treatment cannot automatically lead to the conclusion that the medical assistance was
Page 36 sur 42
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917JUD001588715
17 septembre 2024
Article 298 requires confiscation ( oduzimanje robe ), as a protective measure ( zaštitna mera ), of goods that are the object of the offences referred to, inter alia , in Article 292.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD004574906
22 janvier 2009
As their convictions and their sentence had been final according to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure already on 10 February 1999, the uncertainty arising from the applicants’ mere hope
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD003651597
26 février 2002
What the applicant sought was not recognition – and protection – of a right within the sphere of his private life but recognition of the mere potential or possibility for him to become an adoptive father
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD003629502
2 septembre 2010
... the four life-sentenced inmates at Pleven Prison ... were accommodated in individual front-grilled cells of a mere 4.5 m², in a specific section of the third floor.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD004646616
8 octobre 2019
A mere requirement that an officer who was suspended from office had to request permission to travel during the suspension - a rule the applicant was aware of when she joined the Police Force - could not
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002909409
5 juillet 2016
Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 14 June 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD001431917
10 juillet 2018
Serghides, Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 June 2018, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0926DEC000407815
26 septembre 2017
xa0; Luis López Guerra, President, Branko Lubarda, Helen Keller, Dmitry Dedov, Pere Pastor Vilanova, Alena Poláčková, Jolien Schukking, judges, and Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1118DEC006130200
18 novembre 2003
The applicant submitted in reply that there were no new elements in the 1998 decision which merited a fresh challenge and that, given the mere confirmation of the UAR’s decision of 27 June 1996 by the
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:SO00948
21 octobre 2020
U... sur des écarts de caisse, et alors que cette dernière était partie en réserve pour couper court à la conversation, à son retour en magasin, vous l'avez traitée de « malhonnête, fouteuse de merde,
7ème Ch Prud'homale
5fdd2e18afee2a970c6e7099
3 octobre 2018
Marlène C... sur des écarts de caisse, et alors que cette dernière était partie en réserve pour couper court à la conversation, à son retour en magasin, vous l'avez traitée de « malhonnête, fouteuse de merde
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1006DEC001233686
6 octobre 1986
In this respect reference is made to In re Philip Clark 85 I.L.T.R. 119 where the applicant challenged the constitutionality of Section 165 of the 1945 Act in the context of a hearing of an application
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
président, Renate Jaeger, Karel Jungwiert, Mark Villiger, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Ganna Yudkivska, juges, Pavlina Panova, juge ad hoc, et de Stephen Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0221JUD000879379
21 février 1986
Phillips , ministère de l’Environnement, conseiller ; - pour la Commission M. Gaukur Jörundsson , délégué ; - pour les requérants MM. M. Beloff , Q.C., F.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD004004211
14 novembre 2013
Zupančič, Ganna Yudkivska, André Potocki, Paul Lemmens, Aleš Pejchal, juges, et de Stephen Phillips, greffier adjoint de section, Après en avoir délibéré en chambre du
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1125DEC007237001
25 novembre 2004
the bringing of a new charge within the autonomous meaning of the Convention (see Engel and Others v. the Netherlands , judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, pp. 37-38, § 90, and Phillips
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628JUD003729297
28 juin 2001
The mere fact that these observations refer to supporting arguments in addition to those mentioned in the contested decision cannot justify the possibility to reply thereto.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0921JUD003308296
21 septembre 2000
France judgment of 25 March 1999, to be published in the Court’s official Reports 1999, § 67, and the Philis v. Greece (no. 2) judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1083, § 35). 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0619JUD002274202
19 juin 2008
35382/97, ECHR 2000-IV; and Philis v. Greece (no. 2) , judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, § 35). 52.