CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214JUD004461407
14 décembre 2010
    On 12 April 2006 the District Public Prosecutor's Office informed the police about this criminal complaint and requested that “necessary measures be undertaken”. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0914JUD005231609
14 septembre 2017
    On 30 April 2009 the Court of Cassation declared the applicant’s appeal inadmissible for lack of merit. 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1002JUD000574202
2 octobre 2008
the minor, [the first applicant], Ms A., who was questioned in the presence of Ms L., a lawyer from no. 10 Bar Association, stated that on 14 September 2000 at approximately 6 p.m. she had received a phone
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD000123111
19 décembre 2013
He was transferred back to Sweden in April 2010, in accordance with the provisions of the Dublin Regulation. 12.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420JUD003576107
20 avril 2021
UKRAINE (Application no. 35761/07)         JUDGMENT   This version was rectified on 20 May 2021 under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court   STRASBOURG 20 April 2021    
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510JUD002939295
10 mai 2001
    In April 1989 the police reported that the children's bedrooms were filthy.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614JUD000995804
14 juin 2011
    On 16   April 2008 the Supreme Administrative Court remitted the case for fresh examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD006180008
19 février 2013
    The hearing before the Barcelona Audiencia Provincial took place on 19 April 2006.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1219JUD000978382
19 décembre 1989
‘nothing’ would happen to me on April 2nd).
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139863
2 décembre 2013
Her mobile phone and a computer flash drive were seized and she was released after the interview.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0331JUD006084610
31 mars 2011
Ukraine , no. 38722/02, § 77, 5 April 2005) 47.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD002570311
20 octobre 2015
A panel of the Grand Chamber granted the request on 14   April 2014. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD005606510
8 octobre 2019
    The respondent appealed on 1 April 2008, but failed to sign his appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0511JUD007373117
11 mai 2021
  61467/12 and 3 others, §§ 27, 31 and 34, 25 April 2017). 49.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119JUD005895409
19 novembre 2019
    On 28 April 2009 the Presnenskiy District Court of Moscow upheld the judgment of 11 March 2009.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0829JUD005946421
29 août 2024
    On 26 August 2016 M.K. submitted two video-recordings she had made with her mobile phone to the investigating authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119JUD000188606
19 janvier 2016
Telephone records also showed that in April and May 1995 numerous conversations had taken place between the applicant, R.G., O.L. and G.B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1030JUD002412911
30 octobre 2018
xa0; April 2009. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0608JUD004090598
8 juin 2004
Later that night she had for no apparent reason disturbed the police by repeatedly telephoning the police assistance and emergency number. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110JUD001574115
10 novembre 2022
    On 17 April 2013 the applicant sent her criminal complaint by email directly to the GISF. On 23 April 2013 the GISF forwarded it to the Prague Regional Police Directorate. 27.
Page 36 sur 38
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.