CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD003537515
10 décembre 2020
THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 30.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13153
16 février 2021
Romania - 22003/12 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Applicants’ conviction for minor offences based on decisive
ECLI:CEDH:002-13151
Romania - 11230/12 Judgment 16.2.2021 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Applicants’ conviction for minor offences based on decisive
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD002116308
27 février 2018
In this connection he relied on Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0301JUD004318306
1 mars 2016
The requirements of Article 6 § 3 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1, and therefore the applicant’s complaints under paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD001204705
19 décembre 2017
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0624JUD004480113
24 juin 2021
He complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3   (c) of the Convention. THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1968 and lives in Shepetivka. He was represented by Mr M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD004985310
18 janvier 2024
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 ( d ) of the Convention 8.     The applicants complained principally of the unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0210JUD004327416
10 février 2026
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 ( c ) OF THE CONVENTION 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130JUD002096308
30 janvier 2018
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 65.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1031JUD001146905
31 octobre 2013
    The Court therefore finds that there has been a violation of Article   6   §   1 in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention. II.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0227JUD003081111
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD003890709
5 septembre 2017
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD004707906
28 novembre 2017
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 22.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1114JUD002778395
14 novembre 2000
  Observation de l’article 6 §§ 1 et 3 68.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0611JUD004331608
11 juin 2013
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 AND ARTICLE 6 § 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0416JUD001889508
16 avril 2019
He invoked Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention which reads, in so far as relevant: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512JUD002514807
12 mai 2020
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 52.
CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:002-9486
28 novembre 2013
Croatie (renvoi) - 25703/11 Arrêt 28.11.2013 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-3-c Se défendre avec l'assistance d'un défenseur Déni d’accès allégué du requérant à l’avocat de son choix : affaire renvoyée
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD001981316
17 décembre 2019
There has been therefore a violation of Article   6   §§   1 and 3   (d). (b)    Application no.   50781/16 27.
Page 36 sur 58499
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.