CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
1ère Chambre
DTA_2400838_20250925
25 septembre 2025
Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de M. Lancelot, - et les conclusions de M. Phulpin, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.
DTA_2400848_20250925
DTA_2500123_20260129
29 janvier 2026
Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Cerf, première conseillère, - les conclusions de M.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174182
12 mai 2017
(two counts of attempted murder) in respect of which prima facie cases existed.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708DEC005949409
8 juillet 2025
    As to the applicant’s reliance on the Court’s judgment in Geerings v.   the Netherlands (no. 30810/03, 1 March 2007), the Court of Appeal noted: “43.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1387707-1452165
5 juillet 2005
    European Court President Luzius Wildhaber said “Given the enormous interest in the Court’s work the Internet has to be the focal point of its information activities.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC002672719
21 octobre 2021
    On 9 November 2018 the Supreme Court ( Høyesterett ) dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the High Court’s decision. Relevant domestic law 18 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518JUD002087004
18 mai 2010
However, the Court notes that until June 2007 the domestic courts' prevailing position, as confirmed in the Supreme Court's Resolution of 27 June 2007, was that judicial review by either administrative
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9708
22 septembre 1993
Germany - 15473/89 Judgment 22.9.1993 Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Treatment received and witnessed in the course of an arrest: no violation [This summary is extracted from the Court
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC003734104
3 février 2009
After a series of remittals of the case between various judicial instances, the Tbilisi Regional Court (“the Regional Court”) partly allowed her action on 31 May 2002.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3235
29 juin 2006
As to the statutory basis of the amended G   10 Act, the Court accepts the judgment of the Federal Constitutional court that it satisfies the Basic Law and finds no arbitrariness in its application
Avis
CADA:20163629
6 octobre 2016
Madame X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 19 août 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le premier président de la Cour de cassation
ECLI:CEDH:001-158075
22 septembre 2015
    On 19 July 2011, the Arnhem Court of Appeal ( gerechtshof ) gave its judgment, again convicting the applicant of the offence of transporting heroin and also of four counts of smuggling of
comm
61372389cd5801467740b14c
28 novembre 2000
ce Code, ne court pas à l'encontre de celui qui était dans l'impossibilité d'agir pour avoir, de manière légitime et raisonnable, ignoré la naissance de son droit ; que la cour d'appel, qui relève qu'aucun
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC002414822
4 juin 2024
    At the outset, the High Court gave an extensive overview of the legal framework, including the Supreme Court’s case-law, in which that court had clarified the implementation of the requirements
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0428JUD004694907
28 avril 2009
In a decision given on 24 October 2007, the Katowice Court of Appeal Court criticised the manner in which the investigation had been conducted.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9458
8 juin 1995
THE GOVERNMENT'S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS (Court's lack of jurisdiction ratione temporis and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Applicants' only complaint referred by the Commission to the Court: impossibility
ECLI:CEDH:002-9865
26 juin 1992
Judges from France and Spain sat as members of the Andorran courts, but did not do so in their capacity as French or Spanish judges - those courts, in particular the Tribunal de Corts , exercised their
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915DEC000166619
15 septembre 2020
The Court’s assessment 23.     The Court reiterates that under Article 39 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules of Court, friendly-settlement negotiations are confidential.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223DEC000920009
23 février 2010
In the course of the proceedings the applicant's detention was prolonged regularly by the Kraków Regional Court.
Page 37 sur 36913