Two medical experts visited the applicant, talked to him and informed him that his condition did not warrant the release.

for him to be kept outside his home while the police carried out searches of his properties and cars.

him by ordering his temporary transfer for three months to a different prosecutor’s office.

    In his application form to the Court the applicant claimed that on   8   March 2005, some police officials approached him while he was working in his field.

According to the applicant, this prevented him from remedying the violation of his rights to a fair trial and to respect for his private life and correspondence. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

The applicant stated that on the critical occasion he had twice hit his wife. He also stated that he had asked the witness present to help him dispose of his wife's dead body.

subordinate position, could not have been unaware of the risks to which his vulnerable situation exposed him.

  After his conviction had become final, the City Council (Magistrate) of Krems, which was his last residence in Austria, banished him from Austrian territory by an order of ..

    Moreover, in his application, the applicant states that during his detention he was regularly hit in the face and on different parts of his body with fists, and that he was threatened with

While being questioned as an accused, the applicant protested his innocence and maintained that the drugs had been planted on him by police. He also reiterated his ill-treatment allegations. 5.

At the end of June 1996 the applicant’s son gave evidence about the PKK and his activities within that organisation, following which the district-court judge ordered him to be remanded in custody.

The applicant alleged that his arrest was intended to prevent him from participating in a demonstration scheduled for 31 March 2018.

He is sociable and replies to questions addressed to him. His socio-emotional behavioural development corresponds to his age. ...

He also submitted that the trial court had invented aggravated circumstances against him, such as his intoxication by alcohol, and had failed to take into account those that mitigated his guilt, such as

After about two months, four persons from his military unit had gone looking for him at his house in Asmara, where they threatened his mother and sister.

Under Article 8 of the Convention the applicant claims that he lived almost his entire life in Switzerland which he considers as his home country.

According to the applicant, the officers severely beat him up. Several times they put a plastic bag on his head.

He had subsequently started to run away until the police officers had caught him and pushed him to the ground, at which point he had hit his head.

Prior to his death, the Registry having asked him to send copies of the relevant documents to enable the Court to examine his application, the applicant complained that he could not obtain the copies as