plusieurs personnes, dont certains supposés organisateurs du système ; qu'au cours de cette enquête, clôturée par une décision de classement sans suite, le dernier acte diligenté a été l'audition de Philippe

De Gaetano,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Helen Keller,   Branko Lubarda,   María Elósegui,   Erik Wennerström, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated

The applicant took the view that the mere fact that a law was enacted in pursuance of a State’s positive obligations did not mean that any resulting measure was automatically proportionate.

Phillips , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 23 December 2004, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The first applicant, the Dassa Foundation, and

It originated in an application (no. 25444/94) against the French Republic lodged with the Commission under former Article 25 by two French nationals, Mr François Pélissier and Mr Philippe Sassi, on 18

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 11 October 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Serghides, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Erik Wennerström, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the

10) against the Kingdom of Belgium lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Belgian national, Mr Philippe

Casadevall, President ,   Luis López Guerra,   Kristina Pardalos,   Johannes Silvis,   Valeriu Griţco,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc,   Branko Lubarda, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 15 November 2016, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Zupančič,   André Potocki,   Paul Lemmens,   Helena Jäderblom,   Dmitry Dedov, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 18 June 2013,

Josep Casadevall, President,   Luis López Guerra,   Ján Šikuta,   Dragoljub Popović,   Johannes Silvis,   Valeriu Griţco,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Stephen Phillips

This is the point that Lord Phillips made at para   58 of Adams.

Serghides, President,   Branko Lubarda,   Erik Wennerström, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 17 September 2019, Delivers the following judgment

193.42pt; display:inline-block } .s34F4D0F6 { width:10.87pt; display:inline-block } .s6E5A3B2E { width:220.77pt; display:inline-block }     GRAND CHAMBER DECISION Application no. 71537/14 Phillip

Theresa Forshaw, Ms Gabriella Pellegrini Petit, Mr Antonio Ganado, Mr Vanni Ganado, Ms Maria Galea, Ms Rita Buttigieg, Ms Josephine Farrugia Randon, Dr Stanley Farrugia Randon, Ms Roberta Fenech, Dr Philip

Within the compass thus delimited, the Court may deal with any issue of fact or law that arises during the proceedings before it (see, among many other authorities, Philis v.

The mere fact that the wording of a legal provision affords an element of discretion does not in itself rule out the existence of a right.