At some point in the afternoon, Mr Sharif received a brief in almost the same terms as that received by Mr Sher.

  Her detention on remand was extended several times on essentially the same grounds.

  41138/98, with the exception of Lucreţia Moldovan, Bazil-Sami Lăcătuş and Adrian Moldovan.

He alleged the illegality of the prosecution for the same reasons as those relied on in his appeals at domestic level.

The court declared void the first order of 11   December 1999 to re-instate the applicant, and found that the second order of the same date and with the same number remained valid.

Therefore, the proceedings lasted from 23 May 1986 until 11 November 1997, that is for approximately eleven and a half years.   33.

On 29   December 1999 the hospital decided not to readmit her, and she died on the same day.

The investigation, during which all the accused were questioned, lasted 5 years.

    The Court will first determine how long the enforcement lasted. The enforcement of the judgment of 10 October 2001 lasted five years and eight months.

It thus lasted four years and eight months at three levels of jurisdiction. A.     Admissibility 21.

    The applicant’s detention lasted a total of four years, ten months and 24   days.

It accordingly lasted two months and seventeen days and was based on the suspicion of his repeated involvement in thefts. 14.

They thus lasted 12 years and 12 days for two levels of jurisdiction. 26.

   These proceedings, which began on 17 March 1981 and ended on 14 October 1988, lasted seven and a half years.   24.

    On the same date the applicant signed a separate statement to the same effect. 27.

the other, had been rooted in the same events, and had concerned the same time period and in the main the same amounts. 34.

In the same vein, the complaint under Article 1 of Protocol   No.

An ambulance was called on the same day.

It further noted that statements by detainees held in the same remand centre corroborated the applicant’s allegations.

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.