The applicant, in turn, provided the court with more detailed information about his state of health.

It must therefore be declared admissible. 51.

The stay of his wife and children there was illegal.

On the appeals of the first defendant and the State, the Budapest Regional Court quashed the decision and gave the State leave to join the proceedings. 17.

In 1999 she lodged a complaint before the Equal Opportunities Ombudsman, alleging sexual harassment by a member of the diplomatic staff.

Overnight the applicant was permitted to stay at a hotel of his choice.

This does not mean, however, that in order to be used as evidence statements of witnesses should always be made at a public hearing in court: to use as evidence such statements obtained at the pre-trial

Therefore, the complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention are admissible.

to the State Budget of Ukraine...

of custody and of access under the law of one Contracting State are effectively respected in the other Contracting States. ...

On both occasions they repeated the content of their statements of 10   February 1996. They never mentioned that their statements had been obtained under torture.

The cell was dirty, the air was stale and there were cockroaches, rats, bedbugs and lice in the cell and in the beds.

made during the investigation stage. 19 .

  In addition, the Mayor of Bucharest ordered the restitution of the building to the applicants on 2 September 2005.

    invite the member States of the Council of Europe: ... 3.

During his stay in SIZO no. 1 he did not complain about being beaten by the staff at the SIZO, and was not subjected to any punishment, physical coercion or special measures.

In this connection, the Government also referred to the statements signed by the supposed staff members of the azadliq.info and kanalturan.com websites (see paragraph 21 below) and noted that those statements

M. et Mme C ont contesté le refus du chef d'établissement d'orienter D en classe de première STMG.

s team became the head of the Staff Unit of the Airport, C.M.

of the witness’s untested statements as evidence. 9.