Has there been a breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention?

The applicants’ attention was further drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the

The applicant complains under Article 10 of the Convention, taken alone and together with Article 14, that the publication and distribution of her book was restricted because of its positive depiction

    Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention?

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 §1 of the Convention 7.     The applicants complained principally of the various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression.

    Were the applicants deprived of their liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention?   2.

    Has the applicant got at his disposal effective domestic remedies for his above complaints under Articles 3 and 6 of the Convention, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?

    The applicant complains under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and Article 13 of the Convention that there had been a number breaches of the electoral law and other irregularities

    The applicants complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention that they were not provided an opportunity to examine the prosecution witnesses during trial. THE LAW 5.

34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table, Having regard to the declarations submitted by

The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article   13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated

    Complaint under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention 50.

Ms Khodykina also complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the excessive length of proceedings and lack of the respective effective remedy.

In the applicant’s view, the prisons authorities had thus breached various norms of domestic law as well as Article 3 of the Convention. 2.

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. IV.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 48.

    There has accordingly been a violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. IV.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 48.

Application no. 3744/22 was struck out of the Court’s list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention, on the basis of a friendly settlement between the Government and the applicant (see

    Il y a donc eu violation de l'article 5 § 3 de la Convention. II.     SUR L'APPLICATION DE L'ARTICLE 41 DE LA CONVENTION 35.

  21891/12) under Articles 13 and 18 of the Convention and complaint of Ms Ilyicheva (application no. 60261/12) under Article 3 of the Convention, which were not communicated to the Government, and