The third applicant, Mr Alexandrov (application no. 9777/10) 15.

However, no submissions have been received by the Court. 6.

and they have demanded a fresh expert report of their movable and immovable property... ... the Court dismisses the appeal of the civil parties ... on the grounds that they have not proved losses incurred

been able to avail himself of the rights enjoyed by a suspect in criminal proceedings, including the right not to incriminate himself and to have a lawyer.

The Committee is particularly concerned that all such acts have not yet been investigated and those responsible have not been prosecuted and punished (arts. 5 and 6).

, it could only have done so to same body without there being any requirement that it be differently constituted; it would have been only after a second appeal on points of law that Conseil d’Etat would

Some of them have not been identified by the investigating authorities to date. The others have been arrested. [The applicant] was not residing at his registered address.

For that reason, the defendants who have accepted a part of Mr V[italiy] Vulakh’s estate in inheritance must be considered to have accepted his part in the charter capital of the Kurganinskiy dairy factory

Secondly, the mere fact that the Constitutional Court might have commenced the proceedings without a “predetermined opinion on the possible outcome of the review” could not have reasonably prevented it

These findings by the Constitutional Court have been applicable to date.

First, the State, in its national law, must have expressly excluded access to a court for the post or category of staff in question.

    The cause of K.M.’s death, whether she suffered from any illnesses from birth ... whether an illness she had suffered from birth could have caused her death or somehow have a causal link

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

    In a letter of 24 September 2009, the applicant's representative stated that “no further changes of ownership of the ... properties have taken place up to now”.

es Anton Giulio Lana et Alessandra Ballerini (requête n o   17165/05).

  16219/90, §   20, 31   July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20   January 2009) or at a later stage.

Zupančič (Slovenia), Elisabet Fura (Sweden), Egbert Myjer (the Netherlands), Ann Power (Ireland), judges , Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz (Spain), ad hoc judge , and Stanley Naismith , Deputy Section Registrar